IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wish] draft charter

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 18 December 2020 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEE73A0AD3 for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:54:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UqRMa2m3vr_G for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:54:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 573B53A0AD0 for <wish@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:54:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id o19so9486732lfo.1 for <wish@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:54:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G7BWL27v1AjHNAaG/UvoPUUiDmQIiTf2NssmUWq+zOk=; b=XPbg58FYMLEZk/+wdwUBlbrgpUZxtdstGZfQKSGUcpEyPuU63rOfDXQuBKzv3u7fai vGZ6xPXsqPhzw5LJnvqeoybVv+FgJllbqT05Ry9tBNoHfyQX5oeBFoSt1FMJSlag5Ol6 wmj4XkOBao+YDrwNZPymFpPrdVCAL8Iiw26/3kR07Wr0IT1kmlUJ07I9M+ZHEArUajp0 GXye8Z7IPg4AsWbSeen5mnBFflysuFPuk3d6LCl2SuEnHfrkkfr3kLLdHbPHaEnJ2aAn I2M+zHb0DXrr4fAyf0qfy0cSFwQmx/2T+AkPYC5/HMs9R5oL9RveBOAeLtRGmlETen9X ttNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YIT7nVCcCYdacckcowPAWQLulC7hIzRH4QQK6kPeNbWiFdwFz Rm3osDM3ntl1xASDUEhKj+oieEqJHKw2XYXGUae4ATIgFyg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyD81wwQpJ/zk2J4fQ1sw3U0/2R719ATXjb9r8RzAKZe0m0W3xyxXISrcuUYAbGDvq8BrOabZQqLpfCmYpvWMw=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:f114:: with SMTP id p20mr2149995lfh.292.1608332046301; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:54:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2BA16BAF-CC1D-41B1-887C-99AF82372B94@cisco.com> <6da57174-d574-4b1a-5185-f1e4c1306a7d@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <6da57174-d574-4b1a-5185-f1e4c1306a7d@nostrum.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:53:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+8h=hfbFm3hrnSG9qWaE7y9MhDmVyTwSnkR+jCpKO6yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "wish@ietf.org" <wish@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004d022d05b6c4fca9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/r8eCMmAniHgSqY9ngAxAk5NK3Vs>
Subject: Re: [Wish] draft charter
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:54:10 -0000

I’m happy to put in a milestone for Dec 2021, or whatever other month the
proponents want to use.  Murray’s going to get this WG, so I’ve added him
to the TO list in case he wants to comment.

Barry

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:22 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 12/11/20 13:24, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:
> > I had a look at the draft charter at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-wish/.
> > Overall, it looks pretty good to me, but I do have a couple questions.
> >
> > 1) Is the intent that any WebRTC server, and any WebRTC client, be able
> to use this protocol to establish a one way media session to forward its
> own view of the WebRTC media streams, with or without any alteration, to a
> broadcast network?
>
>
> Server-to-server isn't really in scope, although a server taking media
> that it is receiving and setting up a rebroadcast for it using WISH is
> certainly possible.
>
>
> > 2) I understood from the dispatch session, the time frame for this work
> to complete is expected to be relatively short. It would be helpful to see
> milestones with anticipated dates for completion.
>
>
> Definitely a good point! Notionally, this is your typical "as long as it
> takes but not any longer" desideratum, but we should have goals. I'd
> love to see a single milestone that is "submit WISH document to IESG for
> publication" with a date sometime in 2021. I know this is aggressive,
> but I'm using MARTINI as my idealized model, and we managed to go from
> first draft to publication requested in 13 months.
>
> /a
>
> --
> Wish mailing list
> Wish@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email