Re: Whois++ constraints

Peter Deutsch <peterd@bunyip.com> Thu, 08 April 1993 08:59 UTC

Received: from aggie.ucdavis.edu by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.04) id AA12161; Thu, 8 Apr 93 01:59:18 -0700
Received: from ucdavis.ucdavis.edu by aggie.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.04) id AA19345; Thu, 8 Apr 93 01:29:57 -0700
Received: by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.04) id AA10986; Thu, 8 Apr 93 01:21:20 -0700
Sender: ietf-wnils-request@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.04) id AA10299; Thu, 8 Apr 93 01:00:08 -0700
Received: from [192.197.208.2] by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA10943 (mail destined for ietf-wnils@ucdavis.edu) on Thu, 8 Apr 93 03:57:36 -0400
Received: by expresso.bunyip.com (NX5.67c/NeXT-1.0) id AA26906; Thu, 8 Apr 93 03:55:16 -0400
Message-Id: <9304080755.AA26906@expresso.bunyip.com>
From: Peter Deutsch <peterd@bunyip.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1993 03:55:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: Mark Prior's message as of Apr 8, 17:21
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.4 2/2/92)
To: Mark Prior <mrp@itd.adelaide.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Whois++ constraints
Cc: ietf-wnils@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu

[ Mark wrote: ]
.  .  .
> By the way I intended this syntax to be used for the local constraints
> too, which have the same problem if you try to apply more than one
> constraint to the term.

Understood. I'm being pretty sloppy tonight...



				- peterd


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Deutsch,                                       peterd@bunyip.com
President,                                        (514) 875-8611  (phone)
Bunyip Information Systems Inc.                    (514) 875-8134  (fax)

  "any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology"
           (- with apologies to Arthur C. Clarke, who almost got it right...)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------