Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] adding a type to the source code list: Fwd: AUTH48 [RE]: RFC 9092 <draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-17.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 16 July 2021 21:57 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B848A3A0C80 for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=O4kKpIN/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=KbZ6rVBu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8JnVXff8jQYU for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF92A3A0C7F for <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 95519 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2021 21:57:38 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=1751d.60f200d2.k2107; bh=hgqe/RFKy2VY3GgQ5SGVOX9g0gPJGpAkIlBXq8i0f7Y=; b=O4kKpIN/PGygF9hxwANeDAjkQbsR/YgcqNIuGmbtgOeLw25HjCOJl7bKzs1bqbQvi/XUOLZ87ZFJxRYKvTQOQHDG8GvZ+CXxfUPKxGw2jlVlZPMsKT8fghqZ/bwyLnjAjFhteCMVm5uJOpbtk2zIRemsqRlF/qS7UI94CByRtCD5QFRADWbgP7aZBy5RkAw3Kzrvjh1fLKB5LkJN+OJnTvdZc2/nVgqYSrWa0dNGHRa9NNc/5XjWqmKJ5hQJjU9N3Fo4utaZV+9r8fjHi6isqZj1/T5P4ZE2kFSNlWkO+yOL/8ywJJVtNctpHGahPXPsNpAPuVWecEUkR9z511mrWw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=1751d.60f200d2.k2107; bh=hgqe/RFKy2VY3GgQ5SGVOX9g0gPJGpAkIlBXq8i0f7Y=; b=KbZ6rVBug4+2UpMaktnfniA3aukzhT+UFTtzccBJ3TWD5a1MbnIvhqMuswrCKY2AhUOro2HVjgzP4rVObR2tQ6yTSdQqPQZtVt+urjnk+cKzKjCb8PEWJ5HcT/3FPcxyAs3csyWCJLqExVTn+TnSUGIhIpRXZ8+RXtwjhqUWZs9dryQQDNni3F9AVDqx2CK0eLEZ9RaJBc1IYTLvTtt2Hai8bmpJz4zA3pGcJcIAS/OHlJkPmvapS2x57q0EKGOFp5ZTcqV4oehpmBShirhSe79Dkm34M+EBau/SrjOMLNCIO1q1UNI50sxGdOGpGngEw0Ho/w9CqZdB8Su0uTRMow==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 16 Jul 2021 21:57:37 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 19FA2249DC90; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:57:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7FE249DC72; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:57:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:57:35 -0400
Message-ID: <e7f3a12-4277-caaf-36df-8f1d325a4ae7@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, XML weed whackers <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
Cc: Reuben Esparza <resparza@amsl.com>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <BCA1E2BC-AA1E-4DC9-BE43-2BA156E27F95@amsl.com>
References: <F16062A5-9DC2-4225-8E47-81F8080012BA@amsl.com> <BCA1E2BC-AA1E-4DC9-BE43-2BA156E27F95@amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1898937165-1626472656=:1522"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/99PcsvQQwbU4hb8s4n2KlKcqrI4>
Subject: Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] adding a type to the source code list: Fwd: AUTH48 [RE]: RFC 9092 <draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-17.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the xml and style guide change management team <xml-sg-cmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml-sg-cmt/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:57:47 -0000

> Any concerns with adding “rpsl” to the list of <sourcecode> types, as requested by Warren Kumari (see details below)?  The current list is here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt

It's fine, it's a language with a spec.

>
> The related files are available here:
>
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9092.txt
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9092.pdf
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9092.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9092.xml
>
> Thanks,
> Sandy
>
>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>> From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net <mailto:warren@kumari.net>>
>>> Subject: Re: AUTH48 [RE]: RFC 9092 <draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-17.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
>>> Date: July 11, 2021 at 4:13:38 PM PDT
>>> To: RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>>
>>> Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com <mailto:randy@psg.com>>, OpsAWG-Chairs <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>>, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org <mailto:ggm@algebras.org>>, opsawg-ads@ietf.org <mailto:opsawg-ads@ietf.org>, Massimo <massimo@ntt.net <mailto:massimo@ntt.net>>
>>>
>>>
>
> [snip]
>
>
>>>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Please review whether the "type" attribute should be set for sourcecode elements in the XML file. If the current list of preferred
>>>> values for "type"
>>>> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt>) does not
>>>> contain an applicable type, then feel free to suggest a new one.
>>>> Also, it is acceptable to leave the "type" attribute not set.
>>>> -->
>>>
>>> Option 1: Add a new type to denote RPSL (RFC2622) text, called "rpsl"
>>> Option 2: leave the "type" attribute unset.
>>>
>>> If the only work needed to define a new type is to add the string
>>> "rpsl" to https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt>
>>> then I think Option 1 is worth doing (Section 2.48.4 of RFC 7991 was
>>> not hugely clear to me), otherwise I'm fine with Option 2.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly