IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Xml-sg-cmt] adding a type to the source code list: Fwd: AUTH48 [RE]: RFC 9092 <draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-17.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> Fri, 16 July 2021 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D08D3A4205 for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmTQLtO6ZeI3 for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 149853A4201 for <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AC3389EC1; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M-x_9kQNaw3v; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 2603-8000-9603-b513-adf0-770a-47fb-4bdf.res6.spectrum.com (2603-8000-9603-b513-adf0-770a-47fb-4bdf.res6.spectrum.com [IPv6:2603:8000:9603:b513:adf0:770a:47fb:4bdf]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 683C33898B1; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2EEDD7A4-ACB2-4B16-8DBB-8FA96EC7C818"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:36:13 -0700
References: <F16062A5-9DC2-4225-8E47-81F8080012BA@amsl.com>
Cc: Reuben Esparza <resparza@amsl.com>
To: XML weed whackers <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <BCA1E2BC-AA1E-4DC9-BE43-2BA156E27F95@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/I01hnmbaMmftbFcWMfqzW2FhE5A>
Subject: [Xml-sg-cmt] adding a type to the source code list: Fwd: AUTH48 [RE]: RFC 9092 <draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-17.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the xml and style guide change management team <xml-sg-cmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml-sg-cmt/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:36:23 -0000

Hi all,

Any concerns with adding “rpsl” to the list of <sourcecode> types, as requested by Warren Kumari (see details below)?  The current list is here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt

The related files are available here: 

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9092.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9092.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9092.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9092.xml

Thanks,
Sandy 


>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net <mailto:warren@kumari.net>>
>> Subject: Re: AUTH48 [RE]: RFC 9092 <draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-17.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
>> Date: July 11, 2021 at 4:13:38 PM PDT
>> To: RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>>
>> Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com <mailto:randy@psg.com>>, OpsAWG-Chairs <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>>, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org <mailto:ggm@algebras.org>>, opsawg-ads@ietf.org <mailto:opsawg-ads@ietf.org>, Massimo <massimo@ntt.net <mailto:massimo@ntt.net>>
>> 
>> 

[snip]


>>> 4) <!-- [rfced] Please review whether the "type" attribute should be set for sourcecode elements in the XML file. If the current list of preferred
>>> values for "type"
>>> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt>) does not
>>> contain an applicable type, then feel free to suggest a new one.
>>> Also, it is acceptable to leave the "type" attribute not set.
>>> -->
>> 
>> Option 1: Add a new type to denote RPSL (RFC2622) text, called "rpsl"
>> Option 2: leave the "type" attribute unset.
>> 
>> If the only work needed to define a new type is to add the string
>> "rpsl" to https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt>
>> then I think Option 1 is worth doing (Section 2.48.4 of RFC 7991 was
>> not hugely clear to me), otherwise I'm fine with Option 2.
>> 
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email