IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest, "2.22.3 'style' attribute"

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Fri, 02 January 2015 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A551A1B76 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 08:45:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ACpWdQWSi7w for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 08:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866111A1B5A for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 08:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Philemon (winery.augustcellars.com [206.212.239.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87F932CA2A; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 08:45:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Julian Reschke' <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, davenoveck@gmail.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org
References: <54a5ada8.8822e00a.093b.072a@mx.google.com> <54A64D09.8030108@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <54A64D09.8030108@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 08:44:58 -0800
Message-ID: <018e01d026ab$7c3b0450$74b10cf0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGcZX4pDqTTSqRSDOKTg36H+oJf+QJ8HjhSnQCqUQA=
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/BcXO4lnm4RwICA7HxZJwLJtyOtM
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest, "2.22.3 'style' attribute"
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:45:54 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml2rfc [mailto:xml2rfc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julian
Reschke
> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2015 11:47 PM
> To: davenoveck@gmail.com; xml2rfc@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest, "2.22.3 'style'
attribute"
> 
> On 2015-01-01 21:05, davenoveck@gmail.com wrote:
> > http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-xml2rfc-
> latest.html#rfc.section.2.22.3:
> >
> > Your recent change restricting what can be done in <list style="format
> > ."> is a real problem for me.
> 
> I'm not aware of having made any change with respect to this.
> 
> > In particular, I can no longer control the symbol to be used for
> > bullets by saying, for example, <list  style= "format  o ">.
> 
> Why can't you?
> 
> > I find this necessary when I have <list style="symbols" nested inside
> > <list style="none">.   The xml2rfc processor in its wisdom, gave me
> > pluses in this case, which I had a problem with.
> 
> In the TCL processor, you can override the selection of symbols with a
> processing instruction. Dunno about the Python version.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

Yes the python code also follows the "text-list-symbols" PI.

Jim

> 
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc mailing list
> xml2rfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email