Re: [xml2rfc] draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest, "2.22.3 'style' attribute"
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 02 January 2015 07:47 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6C71A006E for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 23:47:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wRkGUnX39kWn for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 23:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11B101A005D for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 23:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.121] ([93.217.73.238]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYOY5-1YKPFP3JDN-00V4as; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 08:47:26 +0100
Message-ID: <54A64D09.8030108@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 08:47:21 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: davenoveck@gmail.com, "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>
References: <54a5ada8.8822e00a.093b.072a@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <54a5ada8.8822e00a.093b.072a@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:kRD7FYvFGC67D1FomyFWlSAhAkIfz5XHa56DRaNH5Qnk4tOZJvq SAlBvAvnzP4xD8hB93H6zAGeHQ7q6/SJ+TwXaIgwz/g5oTCccqCov+QDyo5aUGTjA+n4F3N klS2BxcfDBghy6qJvKEkl/e3u6Y6CF2w+Sfq9LgEsFdMOpUCAXda34/6UdCSWkRxi9XTiuI M7njPz+hvUPkH/Zwde3xw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/EIHmhDbMYAqwtMgdjTS6xeNeINg
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest, "2.22.3 'style' attribute"
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 07:47:32 -0000
On 2015-01-01 21:05, davenoveck@gmail.com wrote: > http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest.html#rfc.section.2.22.3: > > Your recent change restricting what can be done in <list style=”format > …”> is a real problem for me. I'm not aware of having made any change with respect to this. > In particular, I can no longer control the symbol to be used for bullets > by saying, for example, <list style= “format o ”>. Why can't you? > I find this necessary when I have <list style=”symbols” nested inside > <list style=”none”>. The xml2rfc processor in its wisdom, gave me > pluses in this case, which I had a problem with. In the TCL processor, you can override the selection of symbols with a processing instruction. Dunno about the Python version. Best regards, Julian
- [xml2rfc] draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest, "2.22.3 '… davenoveck
- Re: [xml2rfc] draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest, "2.22… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc] draft-reschke-xml2rfc-latest, "2.22… Jim Schaad