IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] Cross-WG WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-18

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Mon, 09 March 2015 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82D51ACE0D for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dBcRYQU-egUx for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com (mail-ie0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0F61ACE03 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iecvy18 with SMTP id vy18so43692543iec.9 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dHhRfdVWxTB+bO5l3TJ/dNeL6seIE/N6qfASYlDuNks=; b=DFKybwYpoYoVIbcCyIgiU0D0htMi2sEYmnbz4gS6mqzGoYCTWeG6YgyKi2aZ6z1CH3 C87YMBOM3yXDQsSKSTQcV4iz8eyN5EEo7pTtZiCZGk0k+JJLBgzdtCB1r6WX2ttLW37u Pcw1iViSSAN4YCVlfnLX7xK+haN+kKLG5NY4oc9PSIao0eUs+vAGa2K2QhbtjrcMp1+u JxxpQTwKyOLqvOLfr8T1Ab5NkCfoRsx1FuhJD47kIFDdMpHm0c8++VJIJD6ck8BWuxte FFce6Ky3GfB0V4qNj6ETJ/wIC/Sl2Iaj1SulBa209sOO3xcp4HpduwshcCev5pwhKHiV X0MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRAJ8LwUbGm8/uM0juh6r5hkSWGubumYgpckEIEXs69sCyo6tUEz4OqPVovrR2aF6s5mwB
X-Received: by 10.50.30.130 with SMTP id s2mr52097365igh.11.1425941771499; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g74sm10000867ioi.42.2015.03.09.15.56.10 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54FE250D.3010802@andyet.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:56:13 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
References: <98C92FA8-F99C-4861-9199-7B0443506574@nostrum.com> <CAKHUCzw7AXmnNy1LF3y4sv2bQRg-K+eLpszNSxfBaxngsmskQg@mail.gmail.com> <54FE14B7.8020601@andyet.net> <CAKHUCzxaKpD3S1Q02bx9Ow97gdwB6NPNN9BZFS6N5uP0rJ6SUQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzxaKpD3S1Q02bx9Ow97gdwB6NPNN9BZFS6N5uP0rJ6SUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/BqkztYvcJstDCLNvv_0cqpGEBUo>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, XMPP Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Cross-WG WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-18
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:56:16 -0000

On 3/9/15 4:30 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>
> On 9 March 2015 at 21:46, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net
> <mailto:peter@andyet.net>> wrote:
>
>         3) "angle brackets"
>
>         The presence of angle brackets in example 16 is, I think, more
>         confusing
>         than the thing it's attempting to solve; in part because the < does
>         indeed make the jid illegal under §3.3.1, so I didn't initially
>         read the
>         explanation...
>
>
>     I think it would be best for all of the examples to be enclosed in
>     angle brackets (this is what we did in the precis-nickname spec).
>
>
> Yes, that would also work for me.

OK, I'm about to submit a revised I-D, then.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email