Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe + unavailable

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Thu, 28 January 2010 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EF43A68C3 for <xmpp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:07:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KBQCia9EoTAp for <xmpp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net (peirce.dave.cridland.net [217.155.137.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841513A6807 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E8611680B8; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:08:14 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at peirce.dave.cridland.net
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (peirce.dave.cridland.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdN3drTwyATs; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:08:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from puncture (puncture.local [IPv6:2001:838:378:0:221:85ff:fe3f:1696]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EDCF211680B3; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:08:13 +0000 (GMT)
References: <4B6202CF.6070702@stpeter.im> <14795.1264714828.295077@puncture> <4B620861.40603@webex.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B620861.40603@webex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <14795.1264716493.969326@puncture>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:08:13 +0000
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: "bschumac@cisco.com" <bschumac@cisco.com>, XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; delsp="yes"; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe + unavailable
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:07:58 -0000

On Thu Jan 28 21:57:53 2010, Ben Schumacher wrote:
> As the person responsible for the offlist poking, I feel I should  
> step up and point out that stamping delay constitutes a presence  
> leak. If I had a privacy list that blocked you, Dave, from  
> receiving my presence while I'm online then I got offline and the  
> server then decides to respond to probes that indicate when I was  
> last online, you now know that I was online and trying to hide that  
> fact from you.
> 
> 
Yuck. Yes, and if you just noted that sometimes the server did  
include useful data, and sometimes it didn't, then you'd know whether  
the contact had been (or still is) online with a privacy list active.

How horrible that we need to throw away a perfectly good bit of  
functionality to satisfy privacy lists.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade