IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] New(ish) draft: Secure Messaging in XMPP

Bartosz Małkowski <bmalkowski@tigase.pl> Thu, 05 November 2015 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bmalkowski@tigase.pl>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4883D1A8A6E for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 00:42:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.1
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THpkezIbIhiQ for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 00:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mg0.tigase.org (mg0.tigase.org [192.99.18.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1101A8A6D for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 00:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tigase.org (mail.tigase.org [198.27.120.209]) by mg0.tigase.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DAC12700E for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:42:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tigase.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D25140922 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:42:31 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.tigase.org
Received: from mail.tigase.org ([198.27.120.209]) by localhost (t2.tigase.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0tGwwOydA0J for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:42:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.3.171] (host-86-111-123-175.tvk.torun.pl [86.111.123.175]) (Authenticated sender: bmalkow) by mail.tigase.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71AE3140698 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:42:10 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1E0F6102-C156-4AEF-954D-E11C55FF699D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Bartosz Małkowski <bmalkowski@tigase.pl>
In-Reply-To: <562AAAB1.9060906@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:42:04 +0100
Message-Id: <72AA7469-6C93-4C52-BAD8-99A3933FE7AC@tigase.pl>
References: <562AA40E.40407@nostrum.com> <562AAAB1.9060906@andyet.net>
To: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/zcTMMkt3kFUC-K1urESMp1_nwZ0>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] New(ish) draft: Secure Messaging in XMPP
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 08:42:32 -0000

Hi!

I’m curious why IQ stanzas should be encapsulated into IQ stanzas instead of Message stanza.
I think that any kind of stanza what should be protected by e2e encryption should be encrypted and encapsulated with Message stanza. Then this Message is only transport layer.

--
Bartosz Małkowski
Tigase Polska
xmpp:bmalkow@malkowscy.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email