Re: [xrblock] Poll for milestones

Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> Sun, 22 April 2012 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <shida@ntt-at.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2110421F84EC for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HQGvZD-EDv7E for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gator465.hostgator.com (gator465.hostgator.com [69.56.174.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5B721F84DF for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [60.236.86.9] (port=52349 helo=[192.168.1.12]) by gator465.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <shida@ntt-at.com>) id 1SLrFz-0006aP-Md for xrblock@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 02:30:52 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8DD2C9DF-B9FE-419D-A348-91164585F375"
From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <2F723F69184A4AA1AD1A72C040BD9FE1@china.huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:29:49 +0900
Message-Id: <A67FD6BB-A3D3-422A-A822-FD8C53A21ED5@ntt-at.com>
References: <F484FFB1-1BEB-4ADE-8A67-88FCA69CCD97@ntt-at.com> <2F723F69184A4AA1AD1A72C040BD9FE1@china.huawei.com>
To: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator465.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: flh1adm009.tky.mesh.ad.jp ([192.168.1.12]) [60.236.86.9]:52349
X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQ2NS5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Poll for milestones
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:30:54 -0000

Folks;

 Thanks for all of your feedbacks. 

 At this point we as chairs see that there are 
enough interests to keep the milestones thus 
will not be removing them upon updating the 
milestone.  

 We will be contacting those who showed interests  
to work on the draft. 

 Many Thanks
  Shida (as co-chair)

On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Qin Wu wrote:

> Hi,
> I am interested in taking on these work. Here is my review to draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-xr-jb-02 pertaining to the second milestones.
>  
> 1. Boillerplate
> It seems copyright boilerplate and memo status boilerplate are both not correct and should be updated to the latest one.
>  
> 2. Section 1.1, Paragraph 4
> To get alignment with Monarch draft, suggest the following change to the last paragraph of section 1.1.
> OLD Text:
> "
>    Instances of this Metrics Block refer by tag to the separate
>    auxiliary Measurement Identity block [MEASIDENT] which contains
>    information such as the SSRC of the measured stream, and RTP sequence
>    numbers and time intervals indicating the span of the report.
> "
> NEW Text
> "
>     Instances of this Metrics Block refer by SSRC to the separate
>    auxiliary Measurement Information block [MEASIDENT] which contains
>    information such as the SSRC of the measured stream, and RTP sequence
>    numbers and time intervals indicating the span of the report.
>  
> "
> 3. Section 1.3
> Reference [PMOLFRAME] should be updated to RFC6390.
> To get consistent with section 1.3 in draft-ietf-xrblock- rtcp-xr-meas-identity and draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch, I propose the following change.
> OLD text
> "
>    The Performance Metrics Framework [PMOLFRAME] provides guidance on
>    the definition and specification of performance metrics.  Metrics
>    described in this draft either reference external definitions or
>    define metrics generally in accordance with the guidelines in
>    [PMOLFRAME].
> "
> New text
> "
> The Performance Metrics Framework [RFC6390] provides guidance on
>   the definition and specification of performance metrics. The RTP Monitoring
>   Architectures[MONARCH] provides guideline for reporting
> block format using RTCP XR.  Metrics described in this draft are in accordance
>  with the guidelines in [RFC6390][MOARCH].
> "
> 4. Section 2, 1st paragraph
> Section 1.1, paragraph 3 metric defined in this document belong to terminal metric.
> Section 2, paragraph1 said this metric can be sent either from RTP end system or RTP mixer.
> This need to be consistent.
>  
> 5. Section 2.1, figure 1
> To get alignment with draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch, the tag field in the figure 1 and related description should be removed
> And 32 bit SSRC field should be inserted after Block header and related description to this field should be provided.
>  
> 6. Section 2.1 the definition of block length
> Due to one word SSRC field inserted in this block, the block length should be changed into 3.
>  
>  
> Regards!
> -Qin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shida Schubert" <shida@ntt-at.com>
> To: "xrblock" <xrblock@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 7:49 AM
> Subject: [xrblock] Poll for milestones
> 
> > All;
> > 
> > As discussed at the meeting at Paris, there are three 
> > milestones that are lacking editor/author and at least 
> > from the room yesterday, interests in continuing 
> > working on them.
> > 
> > Please indicate by responding to this e-mail the level 
> > of contribution you are willing to make by listing the name 
> > of the draft you are willing to contribute to, and the level of 
> > contribution you are willing to make (e.g. editor level / review).
> > 
> > The three milestones are listed below. 
> > 
> > Oct 2012 - Submit RTCP XR Report Block for Concealed Seconds metric Reporting to IESG
> > Dec 2012 - Submit RTCP XR Report Block for Jitter Buffer Metric Reporting to IESG
> > Dec 2012 - Submit RTCP XR Report Block for Loss Concealment metric Reporting to IESG
> > 
> > Regards
> > Shida
> > _______________________________________________
> > xrblock mailing list
> > xrblock@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> >