Re: [xrblock] 答复: Changes to the name of a metric block FOR perf-metric-registry

Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0162A21F9B8F for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.867
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1rv2JMpL0tjA for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22e.google.com (mail-oa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A446621F9C0A for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l10so2125070oag.5 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AN65VoYciXGLOGw7dvwWECcuRF4L4LcIqBQ4L79+9Ng=; b=cI1X1F8ntm3AVsbp4efd5C0BSq83iWkkmuBTzJkP67xcj7KNQieWRBq26gfePTxj9T xahLxT5G1GdlZ02e7SDYLaVL5eRibO4jRQ5YTiQnrOeIlgAu9WI+bbHo4AMNCqx4XbZ2 wMspsv081dtybOPy9YynkD9BSfwyDchRunLle2Hak9X5NmE+MpjDIeW2vZHqSNWXd23h jQal+4YZMvCDQEJskSYcd7gtgTaxLZK3eZOlDwNCBbhfAPcvpWkRIVq9bz6Y0Vv7TfQl K8drmwrR9pNnAvCxGGweDCGtKZzarCyXYRlIOcSHTgjmRijXtgsbYgzcxLdee+WaD0By puLw==
X-Received: by 10.50.36.100 with SMTP id p4mr813993igj.30.1375292801198; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
References: <B236ED6A-4E09-44E5-A700-44528006B7B9@ntt-at.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43B70D36@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43B70D36@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:46:30 +0200
Message-ID: <1178246868025199403@unknownmsgid>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 答复: Changes to the name of a metric block FOR perf-metric-registry
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:46:52 -0000

Yes to both.

Regards,
Varun

----
http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun

> On 31.7.2013, at 19.09, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Shida:
> Yes, I was reminded by Varun as well.
> My proposed change for threshold defined in the burst gap discard draft is
> Using "Burst gap discard threshold in RTP" to replace "threshold in RTP".
>
> In addition, I am aware that another pitfall, " Total Packets Expected in Bursts " in burst gap discard draft conflict with one used in RFC6958 as well.
> My proposed change is using " Total Packets Expected in Discard Bursts " to replace "Total Packets Expected in Burst"
>
> Let me know if these changes make sense. If yes, I will send a message to RFC Editor and ask her to take proposed change.
>
> Regards!
> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Shida Schubert
> 发送时间: 2013年8月1日 0:30
> 收件人: xrblock
> 主题: [xrblock] Changes to the name of a metric block FOR perf-metric-registry
>
>
> All;
>
> Varun has pointed out that registry in Performance Metric Registry defined in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-claise-ippm-perf-metric-registry-00#section-4
> has duplicate names for report blocks that are semantically/syntactically different.
> It's the "Threshold in RTP" and are currently defined both in RFC6958 and in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard although they  should have a unique names.
>
> The draft is in RFC Ed-Queue and the name will be swapped with whatever we agree on.
>
> If you have a suggestion for a new name, please let me know.
>
> Also if you object to changing the name for any reason, please voice it and present a constructive way to resolve the name conflict issues in "perf-metric-registry".
>
> Many Thanks
>  Shida as co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock