IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] do we need an xrblock wg meeting at ietf-90?

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Thu, 01 May 2014 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDBC1A076C for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 02:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhbck9RgT9eF for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 02:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937481A076B for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 02:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4IAPcWYlOHCzIm/2dsb2JhbABZgkIjIU9XgmenXwEBAQEBBAGCMY9+HQGGbFEZdxZ0giUBAQEBAwEBAQ8RCkELEAIBCA0EBAEBCx0DAgICJQsUCQgCBA4FCBqICwMRAQybS4pHpBUTBIVVhmWBZhYXBAYBgm81gRUElzcCiHuGB4VbgzOCKw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,964,1389762000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="60388557"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2014 05:45:28 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.13]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 01 May 2014 05:44:18 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 1 May 2014 05:45:26 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] do we need an xrblock wg meeting at ietf-90?
Thread-Index: AQHPZLiCYRuvAk50TE2nEToe1IfNcpsrenrA
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 09:45:25 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C7CDFBE@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C7CCC80@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <BLU406-EAS32094D7DA7ECE7FAB76541493410@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU406-EAS32094D7DA7ECE7FAB76541493410@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C7CDFBEAZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/SqGRmCc-CbMNx9CWgCfgBW0NmjQ
Cc: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] do we need an xrblock wg meeting at ietf-90?
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 09:45:34 -0000

Based on the input from Varun and Bernard (thanks!) I will ask for a one hour slot.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:10 AM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Cc: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] do we need an xrblock wg meeting at ietf-90?

If we intend to make progress on the WebRTC items, then a meeting might be useful.

On Apr 30, 2014, at 4:45 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com<mailto:dromasca@avaya.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Time has come for requesting meeting slots at IETF-90 (July in Toronto). However, looking at the milestones, we have only two documents in works that should be completed by July, and two other (WEBRTC-related) that are not WG items. Do we need to meet in Toronto? If you believe so please mention what work items you suggest for the agenda.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org<mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email