[xrblock] do we need an xrblock wg meeting at ietf-90?

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F34E1A6F4D for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wO9ShmmKAa5a for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0181A08BD for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 04:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiYFANThYFPGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABZgkIjIU9XxD6BJxZ0gicBAQMSG14BDAkVViYBBBsaiB8BlyaEWa4sF44gg1yBFQSgLYtggzGCKw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,957,1389762000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="60292215"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2014 07:44:55 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 30 Apr 2014 07:29:01 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:44:54 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: do we need an xrblock wg meeting at ietf-90?
Thread-Index: Ac9kaZY5YRuvAk50TE2nEToe1IfNcg==
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:44:53 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C7CCC80@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C7CCC80AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/i4D8_KZeZrflPARJP_YdibiBznU
Subject: [xrblock] do we need an xrblock wg meeting at ietf-90?
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:44:59 -0000

Hi,

Time has come for requesting meeting slots at IETF-90 (July in Toronto). However, looking at the milestones, we have only two documents in works that should be completed by July, and two other (WEBRTC-related) that are not WG items. Do we need to meet in Toronto? If you believe so please mention what work items you suggest for the agenda.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan