IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02: (with DISCUSS)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 25 August 2011 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1B421F8BD3; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBul7uxciA6b; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C4221F8BBF; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.233.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7P360Mt009855; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:06:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1314241570; bh=Wf/erexGumE/Q+JaGk8GA/6WzWc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=cE5/ypriNr29UM3BjsNfbYd9XjYT9Bf39R9jHaob+eoi9TOEZTJKuxNUOYCXhUU4Z uPkofb5BM3i0LooAgyhH4KfmukCnRxSmbRUfjJfC0FIvDHj0oRIaXlaN12cAjLL1sL 0TKWVQ/k51170gJl8uDdMlv2ENRh511fbnosjQWQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110824184406.0b4bf7a8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:05:58 -0700
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E554A83.6050903@qualcomm.com>
References: <20110822174540.26398.33846.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110823123557.0d863778@elandnews.com> <D41B604F-9452-4F9F-80BA-1FE5B74B171E@vigilsec.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110824111447.076ffd08@elandnews.com> <4E554A83.6050903@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: yam@ietf.org, richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, yam-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 03:05:03 -0000

Hi Pete,
At 12:01 24-08-2011, Pete Resnick wrote:
>Were other comments getting fixed and therefore a new draft will be 
>produced (today preferably) that will address this DISCUSS, or is 
>this the only thing and I should put in an RFC Editor note?

The other comments have been resolved.  It's may be too late to ask 
for a new draft to be produced.

There were concerns within the working group about taking the easy 
path which was to drop the text.  There has been further discussions 
about the replacement text since my latest reply to Russ.  I would 
like to discuss the issue with my co-chair.  My recommendation is to 
remove draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02 from tomorrow's IESG agenda.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG co-chair

P.S. The easier path was actually different from what some WG 
participants may have perceived.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email