IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6409 (3995)

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 26 May 2014 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A191A042A for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 May 2014 19:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9_s_6OqgUfez for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 May 2014 19:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF281A01C8 for <yam@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2014 19:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.115] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1Wokb0-000MRU-PV; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:25:02 -0400
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 22:25:46 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <E1C9935044E562D41D6B9FE8@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240601cfa69e50f9d0@[99.111.97.136]>
References: <20140522105930.779E218000D@rfc-editor.org> <p06240600cfa513ac7ab4@99.111.97.136> <1CD96F1912CBFF4A6A296711@192.168.1.102> <p06240604cfa5730dd57a@99.111.97.136> <CALaySJKCTkk7A=c83VJxwxpyZyDRN6oQcmDJc2NP26e0+HmFKw@mail.gmail.com> <E45DDA85C9C092E7F6D7EF90@[192.168.1.102]> <p06240601cfa69e50f9d0@[99.111.97.136]>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.115
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yam/MpfUq3yA5WDoH3SYQhxcA6bWdvQ
Cc: yam@ietf.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6409 (3995)
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 02:26:13 -0000


--On Saturday, May 24, 2014 12:08 -0700 Randall Gellens
<rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> wrote:

> Consider the work to add the clarifications as a down payment
> on the work of any eventual revision, or insurance that a
> revision will be done without forgetting this discussion now.
> Or, if it's worth publishing the errata, it's worth noting
> that it isn't quite right.

Wfm, noting however that, in my role as keeper of the XML with
comments, etc., I've already marked this change --with a note
that the text isn't quite right-- into the source that would be
used to build 6409bis if Randy and I were to do it.  My previous
note was written with that in mind.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email