Re: [yam] Wasting the working group's time and effort

[Dave CROCKER <[e-mail]>]

Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> You appear to be missing the basics of IETF process understanding.
> 
> Yes, my very little IETF experience is essentially limited to mailing 
> list discussions, thus your latter point may be correct. I've read a 
> fair amount of procedural guides and RFCs, and make a good-faith effort 
> to comply with them, though.


Perhaps you should review the repeated focus on "rough consensus".  You've been
persistent in pressing your points.  I haven't noticed your developing support,
but perhaps you have and can document it.  Failing that, yes, you are wasting
the group's time.


As for interpreting counter-postings as indicating that your points are valid or 
worthy, you would be missing the alternative explanation that the postings are 
either tutorial or defensive against /others/ taking the points as worthy.

That is precisely what I am doing with this, and my previous, posting.

I think enough of us have posted more than enough such notes.  Any more 
responses like this would, themselves, merely waste mailing list bandwidth...

d/


-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net