Re: [yam] Another thought on the template

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> John C Klensin wrote:
>
>> After thinking about this a little more, and reflecting back on
>> the long period of discussions before we moved into a charter
>> proposal, I think that we need to stay tightly focused on
>> objectives and avoid having things in the template (or
>> elsewhere) that might be distractions.  Put more specifically:
>>
>> The YAM objective, reflected in the Charter, is only to move
>> documents from Draft to Full Standard, not to invent and examine
>> other requirements.  Let's reinforce that, and remind WG
>> participants, by including the relevant requirements excerpts
>> from 2026 in the template and by removing anything, such as the
>> interoperability statement pointer, that is not part of this
>> stage of advancement in maturity level.
>
> John, while you are correct as far as process is concerned, most IESG 
> members are at least curious about the implementation report. So 
> actually having the pointer would help me.

Maybe this needs a bit more context: when I recently was the responsible 
AD for moving EPP from Draft to Full, there were some changes in the 
document that required update to the implementation report. But 
hopefully this wouldn't apply to YAM document.