[yang-doctors] Re: draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif-17 ietf last call Yangdoctors review

[Martin Björklund <[e-mail]>]

Hi,


<[e-mail]> wrote:
> Dear Martin,
> 
> On behalf of the authors. A gentle nudge. Does the changes addressing your comments?

The clarifcation in the text makes it more clear what you mean.  I
think that an example would help, but I leave it to you to decide if
you want to include one or not.


/martin




> 
> Best wishes
> Thomas
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graf Thomas, SCS-INI-NET-VNC-E2E 
> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2026 3:03 PM
> To: 'Martin Björklund' <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif-17 ietf last call Yangdoctors review
> 
> Dear Martin,
> 
> On behalf of the authors Thanks a lot again for the review. Your remark makes perfectly sense. It should have referred to "Notification Capabilities". The "Global Notification Capabilities" already had a reference to Section 5.1 of RFC 9196 where those capabilities are defined.
> 
> Here the merge from your input: https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?url_1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif/a8477dd4948ea4cce48b89a8b5d748f49009095d/draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif-18.txt&url_2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif/refs/heads/master/draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif-18.txt
> And there the entire diff from the AD review: https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif-17&url_2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif/refs/heads/master/draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif-18.txt
> 
> Does that addresses your comment?
> 
> Best wishes
> Thomas
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Björklund via Datatracker <[e-mail]> 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 2:30 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif-17 ietf last call Yangdoctors review
> 
> 
> Be aware: This is an external email.
> 
> 
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-notif
> Title: Subscription to Notifications in a Distributed Architecture
> Reviewer: Martin Björklund
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> This is my second YANG doctor's review of this document.
> 
> My only comment is about the terminology.  This document claims that it imports the term "Capability" from RFC 9196, but RFC 9196 doesn't define this term.
> That RFC defines a generic capability model and then defines some specific capabilities, so it is unclear what this term is supposed to refer to.
> 
> The term Global Capability is defined as "The overall subscription capability..."  What is a "subscription capability"?
> 
> It would perhaps help if there was an example that clearly mapped these terms to specifics.
> 
> /martin
> 
>