IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yang-doctors] Need YANG Doctor reviewing the YANG module of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection which I2NSF is about to call WGLC

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 06 April 2019 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E221B1201E6; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m4LViRauCLDo; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 869AC12000E; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id z6so11823414wmi.0; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=+cFnt6b9R3G5X8scK/+gQ5ijIDrDPV3NDhCyq5CHMd8=; b=ZKhKKJ96BM+d7BTaH0SAbPMmmvjCDD8DeD3mUfutDuSo/Tbs9cHWYhppXfO6NQdUU6 BKPUPwjSKQ7LzqxZf6TQHem2n9qypVe1RwQLOuQcvjKVeeGZ73HUmDmRUKORHWKLm3Oj MzyphMQsSk2/q+XKknoUpSW6wiu7aB5xzvqAWM14XLgSbDMcF2U0kToYOy/i+hMYb+Gf lrtZeS+/rEqmDuyTehCxSymh6AltPVmKTbNtmDsl1lr+hU+RH8aG8bEfnE/GbdRAPchk 8MFhGe9Tg/uOnd3nKA8cXtl2vBoBtGv9lbl99Bhjz+brf8jqpB4w/aKZjMSZQCKkGEQe We/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=+cFnt6b9R3G5X8scK/+gQ5ijIDrDPV3NDhCyq5CHMd8=; b=HSO3v3kxhsbcCjk0syZZSZILgtHV0LaxWMiLAAXqdfehX1bXTBXSbmN75iKAAS3hFA 2xONDCuwoEe1x8BjrniYWU/Q7kXgXADYUI+tX6d4VV3QAWfbowBiAWhC+eQWcja68W9z fXtS1QPfCRFbo+phGENnYJdio5z3Awyph5G64Un9uGCkI21wAOgaDWU4zEDDxI1C7R8L APc4qEPrC0obiSZNjhe4g0LVufPPxqiPpRCVrDNXY04ESrRVixSTgeyH86Tj6Znv0Xsn M9BC7BPlmVunQSCMdV9ycMjxg47tWWl1nTfM9nyLSxg1U/a6puiCo24/vl9w4/uxFOW1 JuZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU4vmdrNL3nWRrAmRKHPaWUavATiJYD2B+Abwsg5sJsbEJUWr97 fC4TNnhUwHHbm5dJV7AFodU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzw4hBnNW84+d/Xl1GQJmRbMgdLyjnfq3Nlwo0pf93kDotrfuFvlJACzDv+emvyCmCXPaTiAQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f310:: with SMTP id q16mr11233728wmq.102.1554564066102; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a8sm6642992wmf.33.2019.04.06.08.21.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <823223BF-5B7D-471A-ACD8-7C5319280F49@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AA596A85-BE62-4B3A-A121-E81178A4396A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 18:21:02 +0300
In-Reply-To: <00ad01d4ec66$f3200bd0$d9602370$@gmail.com>
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, yang-doctors@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B363EB2@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <00ad01d4ec66$f3200bd0$d9602370$@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/PgeXL2t-kC-VaSchz4m4W0xGwlE>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Need YANG Doctor reviewing the YANG module of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection which I2NSF is about to call WGLC
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 15:21:10 -0000

Thanks,  I’ve just requested it.

> On 6 Apr 2019, at 13:53, Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Linda,
>  
> following our process I would like to ask you to request a YANG Doctors review on the datatracker page of your draft at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection/>
> This will trigger a regular review by the YANG Doctors.
>  
> Note: You will not see the “Request review” button if you are not logged in into the datatracker.
>  
> To point the reviewer to important issues you can enter on this page also the “Requester's comments and instructions”.
>  
> Please see following pages for further information on YANG Doctors and its process:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/yangdoctors/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/yangdoctors/about/>
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-doctors-review <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-doctors-review>
>  
> Many Thanks,
> Mehmet
> YANG Doctors Secretary
>  
> From: yang-doctors <yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 6:51 PM
> To: yang-doctors@ietf.org <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
> Subject: [yang-doctors] Need YANG Doctor reviewing the YANG module of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection which I2NSF is about to call WGLC
>  
> Dear YANG Doctor:
>  
> We need your help in reviewing the YANG model in draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection which I2NSF WG is about to call WGLC. 
>  
> In particular, we need your advice on the following issue:
>  
> draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04 imports from draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types, which appears to be a generic list of algorithms. 
> The problem is that the list in draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types could contain algorithms that are not suitable for IPsec (such as secp192r1 for key agreement), and right now it seems to lack some older algorithms that have fallen out of fashion (3DES) but is still needed in IPsec.  
>  
>  
> Questions to the YANG Doctor:
>  Is it better to list the IPsec specific algorithms in draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection (which is a subset of draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types? Or to import all crypto algorithms many of which are not relevant to IPsec? What is the common practice? 
> If we do import from draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types, does it mean draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection cannot be published until draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types is published?
>  
>  
> Thank you very much, 
>  
> Linda & Yoav
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email