Re: [openpgp] ALPN and port number distinctions are unnecessary for HKPS [was: Re: use of .well-known in WKD and HKP [was: Re: Resurrected HKP]]Re: [openpgp] ALPN and port number distinctions are unnecessary for HKPS [was: Re: use of .well-known in WKD and HKP [was: Re: Resurrected HKP]]
Andrew Gallagher
2023-10-27
openpgp
None
/arch/msg/openpgp/GTlt8C-HgBHIRwpgFx24yc8fDYc/
3374983
2089369
Re: [DNSOP] A quick update on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf / draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fixRe: [DNSOP] A quick update on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf / draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix
Warren Kumari
2018-10-22
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/IueAhKcR7Zi0hsQrMlTa2O7V9oU/
2647735
1810157
Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-* drafts latest revisionsRe: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-* drafts latest revisions
Adam Roach
2018-10-11
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/Pn1lUK6i2mJzWgJTMIaPU9lapEI/
2642689
1808885
[DNSOP] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with COMMENT)[DNSOP] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach
2018-10-09
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/tYDfZYUr38M8XdsEblNOyVlnpcg/
2642004
1808584
Re: [DNSOP] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [DNSOP] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Warren Kumari
2018-10-09
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/JqK1FFBH1rzntXeV-QRCcCdxrYo/
2641940
1808465
[DNSOP] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)[DNSOP] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Adam Roach
2018-10-09
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/d5KQEP1Ud1TxQpanNMY2_b0CpL8/
2641635
1808465
Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04.txt> (DNS Attrleaf Changes: Fixing Specifications with Underscored Node Name Use) to Best Current PracticeLast Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04.txt> (DNS Attrleaf Changes: Fixing Specifications with Underscored Node Name Use) to Best Current Practice
The IESG
2018-09-11
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/MHK-wwyDgT6sXCw4HSqhvlNTCYA/
2630711
1804266
[DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04.txt> (DNS Attrleaf Changes: Fixing Specifications with Underscored Node Name Use) to Best Current Practice[DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04.txt> (DNS Attrleaf Changes: Fixing Specifications with Underscored Node Name Use) to Best Current Practice
The IESG
2018-09-11
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/J7POabk1MCzaZHa4tELuvLPN6fI/
2630712
1804267
Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleafRe: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
Adam Roach
2017-08-09
art
None
/arch/msg/art/_MXkmYprtv2E9QXii7dYB96IXvU/
2431865
1718711
Re: Why are mail servers not also key servers?Re: Why are mail servers not also key servers?
John R Levine
2017-04-21
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/2BNC4N3IHv4TpYl0hbioLQQkbTg/
2382583
1699775
Re: Why are mail servers not also key servers?Re: Why are mail servers not also key servers?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2017-04-21
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/QWKnHe0qxyuNROaILAK15bubyx0/
2382475
1699775
Re: Why are mail servers not also key servers?Re: Why are mail servers not also key servers?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2017-04-20
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/qk-OfpRTaPwTSvsQCS-EDZCLMe8/
2381970
1699775
Re: Case distinctions as theoretical exerciseRe: Case distinctions as theoretical exercise
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2016-03-16
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/5rb3a1eVs5Rp78sZZ-di1fQiHgY/
2174941
1339152
Re: [openpgp] [dane] Storing public keys in DNS or LDAP, or elsewhereRe: [openpgp] [dane] Storing public keys in DNS or LDAP, or elsewhere
Ben Laurie
2013-08-09
openpgp
None
/arch/msg/openpgp/ZxDOkdSW1K-hnt8SB5lyhO1bHKI/
1096737
1529182
Re: [dane] [openpgp] Storing public keys in DNS or LDAP, or elsewhereRe: [dane] [openpgp] Storing public keys in DNS or LDAP, or elsewhere
Ben Laurie
2013-08-09
dane
None
/arch/msg/dane/rbu7EniNUJKnMFg_lS4NspCmp6U/
314497
1109393
Re: [openpgp] [dane] Storing public keys in DNS or LDAP, or elsewhereRe: [openpgp] [dane] Storing public keys in DNS or LDAP, or elsewhere
John Gilmore
2013-08-07
openpgp
None
/arch/msg/openpgp/am8iYGHwgNrnQu7N4eEsTseaiZQ/
1096730
1529182
Re: [dane] Storing public keys in DNS or LDAP, or elsewhereRe: [dane] Storing public keys in DNS or LDAP, or elsewhere
John Gilmore
2013-08-07
dane
None
/arch/msg/dane/qPK5fx3YNPYVj_aKjuBsWfhqrWQ/
314490
1109393
Re: [openpgp] [dane] Storing public keys in DNS… or LDAPRe: [openpgp] [dane] Storing public keys in DNS… or LDAP
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2013-08-06
openpgp
None
/arch/msg/openpgp/0G7e3S8bGlhTc_6DiGUsUHKq5UA/
1096729
1529182
Re: [dane] Storing public keys in DNS… or LDAPRe: [dane] Storing public keys in DNS… or LDAP
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2013-08-06
dane
None
/arch/msg/dane/WYGx5bU3oWlqVqah5jUITmJxweg/
314489
1109393
RFC 4386 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Repository Locator ServiceRFC 4386 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Repository Locator Service
rfc-editor
2006-02-04
pkix
None
/arch/msg/pkix/ZALq2AzsJQqQkdGBHAo-eh4iCSg/
1162729
1550570
RFC 4386 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Repository Locator ServiceRFC 4386 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Repository Locator Service
rfc-editor
2006-02-04
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/eDTizdPc_-SuS-jZyMn7kFoCP0g/
664772
1375910
[rfc-dist] RFC 4386 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Repository Locator Service[rfc-dist] RFC 4386 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Repository Locator Service
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
2006-02-04
rfc-dist
None
/arch/msg/rfc-dist/Rx1DyFvM_1keOvx_7pFW-ez4GwY/
2271233
1571883