Re: Case distinctions as theoretical exercise

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 16 March 2016 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D823312D765 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r8zqFCWShvlZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com (mail-lb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A667E12D56B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-x231.google.com with SMTP id k12so49254128lbb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=Nz9zo2U7uR4FDW9fdq/VnsilIVq1CzSfj/Z/SUU0oyY=; b=Z80Z3gPFK10rza3vRj88LoSist3J/6atJRds34QlGgliPaLJRjuBLz4H6RahxdOvsT eFVdw2LG8hI9yaKlXjN3xPJ33NLRGUcA8KqKdb26Z/0nRPGkZ00MA6kVMbaHe4y+B79b km59PK0E/AxVlJ8d4lrJDvGToSZlNafylmmsJwALm5YrcW0IFdBUZV1UsuEbGr3FIzYN RLVVfG60ntzHNGMfN7Txq2eLNox1af4qo96M4U+AYRxxESm3JzvDka04uT1oIVz3BRpW oPQqn+eE0GmCHBz/sGV8CFeHWEBbIyCEuVydt0WWYvwgPhIWDZiZpcuWNbnXouc07o+d Dnfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Nz9zo2U7uR4FDW9fdq/VnsilIVq1CzSfj/Z/SUU0oyY=; b=lzp3NHnD2whxJPkLjcRTv1Wf3sXu6/RHV/6g+kY7zdnzGDxB6GvWoq6S/EitA5pv1V MmnJzyuWMEb+UUReC3P5YokVdhhfWNt2kdCGrI9Aej0OQ/ofWQBBKU2bRMjNAeAr3l/S r06StArEm8EX81BK+Qm+lzh8miLNLovC2DihW4WAgJ7sHi2M6421XbuU+v1sMcX+kjff KF62hlJOYnmT6p1WOtK0i488QndD1QdN5kUr9PMG3wg8qK/ajItLF/W1J1BA8bJm81yG 7KPJ27AmDM1Nd9ZFYApZTJ4YZtUfc0pxk8XTGOfo0qolParFJ2zF0Ow2/zpJEoS3yk45 80iA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJINdKGb9mqk4ihYXhspmAVNxdoUZA5ajwnajlJgnMyCr4wcEq8MuXgKMbY/TdQ7GISqFdXrF3MlpG99hg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.124.137 with SMTP id mi9mr1582585lbb.112.1458139156789; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.151.67 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160315163842.19309.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <CAMm+Lwh9E2Q9sG5NNiENr0Zhghjf-EUa-ptM+dZYTnC-3XLzUg@mail.gmail.com> <20160315163842.19309.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:39:16 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QxJaWBDH-UDtXdxgdoDcxwLB-JU
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhwJKzZCeJmV=mTYjDFUg61a+GYsUfKX9_fFsFVLB7HaA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Case distinctions as theoretical exercise
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5rb3a1eVs5Rp78sZZ-di1fQiHgY>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:39:21 -0000

No, I mean like

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4386

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:38 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>The only way you could do that sort of thing with DNS records is if
>>you were doing something like S/MIME and you had a LRA for the domain
>>with its own root or intermediate cert and published an authenticator
>>for that in the DNS. then you could put a link to your directory where
>>account granular lookup can be performed in the DNS next to it.
>
> Ah, you mean like  draft-bhjl-x509-srv-00
>
> R's,
> John