Re: dane-openpgp 2nd LC resolution

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Sun, 13 March 2016 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6E812D9BD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DlqbIcaUdbT1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1024A12D858 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qNcX46xhyz1J5; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:28:52 +0100 (CET)
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zevyoLYI-CnS; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:28:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:28:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 334FD6066256; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:28:46 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 334FD6066256
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F671A3C7; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:28:46 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:28:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: dane-openpgp 2nd LC resolution
In-Reply-To: <D82585411EE24A700558FD25@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1603131922060.27864@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20160313171101.3215.qmail@ary.lan> <F4DDCAC0-ACDF-4FD9-978E-90F4349A0420@dukhovni.org> <D82585411EE24A700558FD25@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KskbbFSOLG71lUkHBYJFPgN6Gc4>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:28:59 -0000

On Sun, 13 Mar 2016, John C Klensin wrote:

> -07 was actually more clear about the issues with that than -08 is,


The change between 07 and 08 was by direction of the AD. So the author
and the AD have tried to write text that would resolve your issue. There
is really only one person left that can write text that you will agree
with, and that is you.

> but neither goes far enough, IMO, in detailing the risks that the
> community perfectly well knows about.

Note again that the "risks" are:

1) email being sent to the intended user in the clear like it happens now.
2) email being sent to the wrong user encrypted to the wrong user's key,
    which is not as bad as being sent in the clear like it happens now.

Paul