Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
2023-09-29
bess
None
/arch/msg/bess/C0Tw2ZxomrUt4bNi3hl-SqqRjcw/
3361664
2087293
Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
2023-09-29
bess
None
/arch/msg/bess/34i8thkKRKLuhmen4i-8IxMTLQ8/
3361653
2087293
[bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)[bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
2023-09-29
bess
None
/arch/msg/bess/nzaHJPHMW3IucI-C35MkYvBgcBg/
3361537
2087293
Re: [nfsv4] possible RFC 5531 addendumRe: [nfsv4] possible RFC 5531 addendum
Trond Myklebust
2022-08-24
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/bVz8HvNQK46H7tzh3US1saGFNPk/
3215620
2026170
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Chuck Lever III
2022-08-15
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/LLkboiARTrPuZyNCnkp70YJKvw4/
3211928
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Reuben Esparza
2022-08-15
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/qXSty4YZeXGhbVS0uZLdSojmQMY/
3211917
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Chuck Lever III
2022-08-12
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/9X4v1Ifqi8X4gMpMHSG301NfHdQ/
3211087
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Reuben Esparza
2022-08-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/XQpjDh77jKRWmI3zhgZm46g4_6s/
3210887
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Chuck Lever III
2022-08-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/6_czU3CYpG1BdA8jb-M0n-o5Rn0/
3210852
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Reuben Esparza
2022-08-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/rE5DNPJLBEn6Iz-qqnFuqqNtZ3g/
3210848
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Chuck Lever III
2022-08-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/4TMB_QtAj2aeBUMAMolpGo0RCEc/
3210125
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Reuben Esparza
2022-08-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/qL4tKQxHXBf8vIQurqbu62rhPjw/
3210114
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Chuck Lever III
2022-08-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/92gKWSmkD0-dS2lQ9inqaNBbZj4/
3210106
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Reuben Esparza
2022-08-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/tKkPmfFfTdIRjS39GeLKQjgxoos/
3210097
2024018
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9289 <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-11> for your review
Chuck Lever III
2022-08-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/2dOz3n6WnhY8MY1SG8FfFfcqqFs/
3209675
2024018
Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?
Rick Macklem
2021-06-03
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/tMv2VmUYMxtxkP2mlgqeiBkWeag/
3040363
1955864
Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?
Rick Macklem
2021-06-03
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/zys7mJHYey6yNfFZTj5BFIqHxes/
3040350
1955864
Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?
Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2021-06-03
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/f5q9ZLILdXiyIq_7mck5ySK_ZBM/
3040258
1955864
Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?
David Noveck
2021-05-30
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/WOr0u4c3R80QEqYFZZHqI1fM_KY/
3039111
1955864
Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?
Rick Macklem
2021-05-28
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/8UJJXHeHzsEIG8C-644IP0lWxxg/
3038608
1955864
Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?
David Noveck
2021-05-27
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/Rslu5NNcCNQkge8Vs-t_OyVSp4s/
3038415
1955864
Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?Re: [nfsv4] correct error reply when RPC-over-TLS is required and is not being used?
Rick Macklem
2021-05-26
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/VEzS7D5k58jxfAabzwSltWAf31s/
3038127
1955864
Re: [nfsv4] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [nfsv4] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Chuck Lever
2020-08-28
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/obGpZUTfO0Ep4mHLoQ00P2mitfw/
2924804
1902720
Re: [nfsv4] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [nfsv4] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
David Noveck
2020-08-26
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/bcM78MJY6u77CV7CrY9gMU9sIyI/
2923860
1902720
Re: [nfsv4] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [nfsv4] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Chuck Lever
2020-08-26
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/lLASaiO1aiZvfLx5AOTk_o4OEsA/
2923854
1902720
Re: [nfsv4] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [nfsv4] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
David Noveck
2020-08-24
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/BgbHEFKtv76dEMuA9WXFKPLdrI4/
2923103
1902720
[nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5531 (6255)[nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5531 (6255)
RFC Errata System
2020-08-12
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/0mPf5H91KhrN3QG_kH0EtExpb1A/
2918248
1908914
Re: [nfsv4] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [nfsv4] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Chuck Lever
2020-06-30
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/iWFK2PGp4mM_mFH9WW1udsexiCU/
2897161
1901089
Re: [nfsv4] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [nfsv4] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Martin Duke
2020-06-29
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/Niv_QOuAmiPxJlq5EUKjuZqwLT0/
2896822
1901089
Re: [Last-Call] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [Last-Call] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Chuck Lever
2020-05-25
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/EIKCyI65-8wgOerg7_TOYgeDR4w/
2883291
1896526
Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Chuck Lever
2020-05-25
gen-art
None
/arch/msg/gen-art/Fmzmc4sGA5YSMNHqW9zhQNFG2b0/
2883292
1896527
Re: [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Chuck Lever
2020-05-25
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/jtSSPn0n5qd3uMECXm-v-iEaPAo/
2883293
1896525
Re: [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Chuck Lever
2020-05-25
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/GJep3Sozv8lwkWr8qyOEABJHJkc/
2883288
1896525
Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Chuck Lever
2020-05-25
gen-art
None
/arch/msg/gen-art/Aq-5zzeqfL6UuTC_2394mQGVA6A/
2883289
1896527
Re: [Last-Call] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [Last-Call] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Chuck Lever
2020-05-25
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/yfbeMiuNIHpHLfIsxEI3rPpLvXo/
2883290
1896526
Re: [Last-Call] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [Last-Call] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Trond Myklebust
2020-05-25
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/ZUjZQQRzAtPvugOefNrOLZB-Pss/
2883251
1896526
Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Trond Myklebust
2020-05-25
gen-art
None
/arch/msg/gen-art/Jn75BfUmM-00T93bxGswl9KK8IE/
2883252
1896527
Re: [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
Trond Myklebust
2020-05-25
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/MTKgkptbbDTkWr6yUCoORWndXwk/
2883253
1896525
Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
David Noveck
2020-05-25
gen-art
None
/arch/msg/gen-art/Y-4jOwUdELPK01zamuNwE6YQ_8E/
2883245
1896527
Re: [Last-Call] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07Re: [Last-Call] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-07
David Noveck
2020-05-25
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/zZlILzwxitXyFllWJQ8elBzr9WI/
2883246
1896526
86 Messages