Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Hector Santos
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Bv4GcuxnRC4tOou0EYYNpKvpe34/
3437064
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/s-rucCHKKW_Mi6cS78xsjWWKnjE/
3437043
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/K_HVL5VVm6oFXc3NY_GZLrDBwXE/
3437034
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/CH3DB-5pe-FL_rX2-31T4oll9NQ/
3437027
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Pvo-4FuSpo70ESKgyz402hGo444/
3436998
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/82NQsNIq-AE3mn4iYZwYaev7FWg/
3436974
2124276
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/S6C28B5JWORxHIUZNy58XeArSe0/
3436964
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DISCARD: 4.3. Authentication MechanismsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DISCARD: 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-04
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/4-s7VO7unmhlkhrKeMBJw-eegrs/
3432292
2122137
[dmarc-ietf] 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms[dmarc-ietf] 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-04
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Tw_gY_ss4SR3xJZR0Z0nTr9ha2I/
3432290
2122137
I-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-04.txtI-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-04.txt
internet-drafts
2024-02-20
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/iW1Ttz0IDVL0Pbq1U6Vq2xI18HU/
3425847
2118844
I-D Action: draft-chuang-identifying-email-forwarding-00.txtI-D Action: draft-chuang-identifying-email-forwarding-00.txt
internet-drafts
2024-02-19
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/JtUdDmHxGKiLwMsmJoYCPkgY4iA/
3425382
2118604
Re: [Uta] SMTP TLS reporting (RFC 8460), policy domains and DANERe: [Uta] SMTP TLS reporting (RFC 8460), policy domains and DANE
Mechiel Lukkien
2023-11-17
uta
None
/arch/msg/uta/889CErv7JshxqYrqOUe9fAOeWYg/
3385719
2097932
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118
Douglas Foster
2023-10-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/AHRp4bq5cLlQrEINg7k5xJFzcIA/
3375589
2093388
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118
Richard Clayton
2023-10-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/III2lIxedP2irsnU3-WRrsGb7WI/
3375545
2093388
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118
Mark Alley
2023-10-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ra29ZIQwmdJrLrwkk0IWQDQ-gRY/
3375530
2093388
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118
Alessandro Vesely
2023-10-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Dpavw9Xd5VBZaFHA100k_IBsT5w/
3375527
2093388
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118
Wei Chuang
2023-10-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ynllRU9YzdR5erk1C8ByNequd8s/
3375490
2093388
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118
Scott Kitterman
2023-10-28
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/h6ABfZy6IaKq7-ZR5HhAJFOkzSw/
3375364
2093388
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118
Richard Clayton
2023-10-28
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fHIUkLe93ImeEU19URTkyf2qUNI/
3375360
2093388
I-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-03.txtI-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-03.txt
internet-drafts
2023-08-13
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/e_aXCOVOCi9YXZVfVtWoLRF3GKs/
3342697
2078899
I-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-02.txtI-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-02.txt
internet-drafts
2023-08-12
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/k4rGf8tA-0Ba2NpfaY1aKALWkhQ/
3342502
2078774
I-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-01.txtI-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-01.txt
internet-drafts
2023-07-24
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/hXL2qZwRum6TChNkpFZOA4xpor4/
3333364
2075354
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)
Neil Anuskiewicz
2023-07-23
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/zRFsOinh_m9Ab6gK6bt7s9fXkTM/
3333140
2073634
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)
Scott Kitterman
2023-07-12
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/5uYY1qOHql_uOoC8UUqCp4K1zJk/
3328843
2073634
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)
Jan Dušátko
2023-07-12
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/xpfvn_EV2uwxi8UZrZZm-cACWj4/
3328812
2073634
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)
Douglas Foster
2023-07-12
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/OIv5kwji7izdgOB-UszGAAC-Kgo/
3328690
2073634
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)
Wei Chuang
2023-07-12
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/tTj8Diprqw-sXz-oeFOzQXs8llY/
3328685
2073634
[dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)[dmarc-ietf] Protocols All The Way Down (long - sorry)
Scott Kitterman
2023-07-11
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ENz8XOsBs-3vZWTGMDW5HYmHYs8/
3328069
2073634
I-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-00.txtI-D Action: draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications-00.txt
internet-drafts
2023-07-10
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/27EFylXPV6wwt0tVEwV7SrCQymE/
3328046
2073617
Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)
Hector Santos
2023-06-12
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/JN_yhb7Mt8dW_7vDhgpLvl3AeJQ/
3317838
2068573
Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)
Chris Smiley
2023-06-12
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/54oTYGfWcDSAiEgztCRufIAM3cU/
3317830
2068573
Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)
Alessandro Vesely
2023-06-11
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/5eDyFSk5TFLAasOD7GyHrkcIz2w/
3317510
2068573
[spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)[spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)
RFC Errata System
2023-06-09
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/6P6wJbS-O0kk8_lqfJuIwl4U73A/
3317336
2068573
Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count InconsistenciesRe: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies
Klaus Frank
2023-02-02
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/NrYX6hSy88fhMYTSwDHUYn0UXNo/
3272005
2047121
Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count InconsistenciesRe: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies
John R Levine
2023-01-23
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/Zaq-BOmu-lBG_QOtxVomXMjNFX0/
3268477
2047121
Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count InconsistenciesRe: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies
william
2023-01-23
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/IXAeWcKSRDRgnJJpoFoku9_auCI/
3268299
2047121
Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count InconsistenciesRe: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies
Jan Schaumann
2023-01-23
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/VQ2errf2nt6FHEs22d66RIoCoi0/
3268296
2047121
Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count InconsistenciesRe: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies
Tim Wicinski
2023-01-23
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/Tj5jPuuqrL3awbmhzKpEMDQC7rA/
3268294
2047121
Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count InconsistenciesRe: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies
John Levine
2023-01-23
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/zBpFUhQJQZmp8i4o7Joq-wt6dSo/
3268293
2047121
Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count InconsistenciesRe: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies
Tim Wicinski
2023-01-23
spfbis
None
/arch/msg/spfbis/HPG4e3mgWX6JVF2jzn2XVmSWVKo/
3268287
2047121