[openpgp] Alternate signed-only e-mail structure (avoiding drawbacks of multipart/signed) [was: Re: Transporting certificates in messages][openpgp] Alternate signed-only e-mail structure (avoiding drawbacks of multipart/signed) [was: Re: Transporting certificates in messages]
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2024-02-20
openpgp
None
/arch/msg/openpgp/XG0h3nH-FUQ7-WNYO2PBAIMbVsI/
3426135
2117765
Re: [openpgp] Transporting certificates in messages [was: Re: Transport public keys inside the message body]Re: [openpgp] Transporting certificates in messages [was: Re: Transport public keys inside the message body]
Andrew Gallagher
2024-02-19
openpgp
None
/arch/msg/openpgp/KSJI3P_ukMFUnUqddZKKFxykZu8/
3425347
2117765
Re: [openpgp] Transporting certificates in messages [was: Re: Transport public keys inside the message body]Re: [openpgp] Transporting certificates in messages [was: Re: Transport public keys inside the message body]
Bart Butler
2024-02-16
openpgp
None
/arch/msg/openpgp/5WlGn6QcEP9CfvlmiUmrZE3avNA/
3424349
2117765
Re: [openpgp] Transporting certificates in messages [was: Re: Transport public keys inside the message body]Re: [openpgp] Transporting certificates in messages [was: Re: Transport public keys inside the message body]
Andrew Gallagher
2024-02-16
openpgp
None
/arch/msg/openpgp/-E-PZL1E-zd04BDJyjbu639zSCU/
3424278
2117765
Re: [Ietf-dkim] Question about lone CR / LFRe: [Ietf-dkim] Question about lone CR / LF
Dave Crocker
2024-02-03
ietf-dkim
None
/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/05hWWZJEqc7gf_Vi1iZKuvuliD8/
3418986
2114776
Re: [lamps] [EXT] Common Name in SubjectRe: [lamps] [EXT] Common Name in Subject
Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
2024-01-19
spasm
None
/arch/msg/spasm/W8ifNvTt-jfDR9szyW9M3ACaA14/
3408018
2110157
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.FromRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Hector Santos
2024-01-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ME5LsFs_MpeOAuHODqOcPa4XqMs/
3407620
2108110
Re: [Emailcore] DSN extension, Applicability statement and spam blowbackRe: [Emailcore] DSN extension, Applicability statement and spam blowback
Francesco Gennai
2024-01-06
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/jvb5oguOBBN_PNf2DUZE5lQTxnU/
3402102
2106142
Re: [Emailcore] DSN extension, Applicability statement and spam blowbackRe: [Emailcore] DSN extension, Applicability statement and spam blowback
John R Levine
2024-01-05
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/i5BKnq3gH6n-HlfTLdGxyLhEC8g/
3401934
2106142
Re: [Emailcore] resent-x as trace headers, WGLC on draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-08Re: [Emailcore] resent-x as trace headers, WGLC on draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-08
Dave Crocker
2024-01-01
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/DmTy3WxX7dhqwyBZHyDyFyfSff0/
3400131
2102891
Re: [Emailcore] a lot of DSNs, Issue 40 - Discussion of Recommended SMTP extensions in A/SRe: [Emailcore] a lot of DSNs, Issue 40 - Discussion of Recommended SMTP extensions in A/S
Steffen Nurpmeso
2023-12-06
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/C8AlDZHkNJrjUWuP3A_QbMmqG4s/
3392565
2100956
Re: [lamps] draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection: Why signalling won't work for nowRe: [lamps] draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection: Why signalling won't work for now
Phillip Tao
2023-10-13
spasm
None
/arch/msg/spasm/Ur3OVj7ryNLqBQ1Iefsmm39uQfo/
3367559
2085987
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9479 <draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-04> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9479 <draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-04> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-09-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/jTQlNz8ITiRA8wtdsw1MLyH0dNI/
3361736
2084064
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9479 <draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-04> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9479 <draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-04> for your review
Acee Lindem
2023-09-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Y6q12NXEfhnroNk7ovJ9xwWoUmk/
3360928
2084064
Re: External overlap [Re: Proposal for Consolidating Parts of the ART & TSV Areas]Re: External overlap [Re: Proposal for Consolidating Parts of the ART & TSV Areas]
Keith Moore
2023-09-21
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/AEHjNire8eQReTDKNXV62qrUQ34/
3358354
2083505
Re: [Ietf-dkim] What makes this posting different from the original posting?Re: [Ietf-dkim] What makes this posting different from the original posting?
Laura Atkins
2023-09-01
ietf-dkim
None
/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/pqFSwT-dZItynjqoCmU5dOsTLNk/
3350606
2081650
Re: [Ietf-dkim] What makes this posting different from the original posting?Re: [Ietf-dkim] What makes this posting different from the original posting?
Grant Taylor
2023-09-01
ietf-dkim
None
/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/Q_lFzGnJ3AaTEIc0s6mefKWgzEc/
3350604
2081650
Re: [rfc-i] Example RFC numbers?Re: [rfc-i] Example RFC numbers?
Robert Sparks
2023-08-22
rfc-interest
None
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/T5jkDlwmqqUgt0w-PnRUByEd2ME/
3346561
2077692
Re: [rfc-i] Example RFC numbers?Re: [rfc-i] Example RFC numbers?
Brian E Carpenter
2023-08-22
rfc-interest
None
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/2xqyv3Om1XUJwEbHefvguwBFWk4/
3346556
2077692
Re: [rfc-i] Example RFC numbers?Re: [rfc-i] Example RFC numbers?
Carsten Bormann
2023-08-22
rfc-interest
None
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/Dy-Em9-iPdyR03wiMv-XTn3dxas/
3346280
2077692
Re: [dmarc-ietf] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dmarc-listugh-00.txt (fwd)Re: [dmarc-ietf] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dmarc-listugh-00.txt (fwd)
Hector Santos
2023-08-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Xd5HoCKLad-e9TU8k69zlH_jhvo/
3342883
2078917
Re: [dispatch] Proposal for Per Resource Events ProtocolRe: [dispatch] Proposal for Per Resource Events Protocol
Rahul Gupta
2023-08-14
dispatch
None
/arch/msg/dispatch/la1CdwEbojGNQV4mDIJFOS1QGiw/
3342869
2077747
Re: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP serverRe: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP server
Carsten Bormann
2023-08-07
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/yuKbR1EYaZtrUoaIuilXoUl3oTw/
3340314
2077748
Re: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP serverRe: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP server
Carsten Bormann
2023-08-07
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/JF9y7ZBpgGRtItmf0yBAnjdFNws/
3340313
2077748
Re: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP serverRe: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP server
Rob Sayre
2023-08-07
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/JohSxpaYMQhx4x3uONg2Fl-jmpM/
3340298
2077748
Re: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP serverRe: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP server
Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
2023-08-07
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/gYJ348FY1JHQzTxcuVTKcvYp1Q4/
3340045
2077748
Re: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP serverRe: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP server
Erik Auerswald
2023-08-07
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/tes58mDWoqcRnGNMGgR5TY3G3VQ/
3340025
2077748
Re: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP serverRe: [Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP server
Jay Daley
2023-08-07
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/vwIEPIXZ-Yk9cGYqZtTh-TS4SpI/
3340023
2077748
[Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP server[Tools-discuss] reference emails via IMAP server
Michael Richardson
2023-08-07
tools-discuss
None
/arch/msg/tools-discuss/XSyLNXCG2NkIsyIYuNOMGity7HE/
3339947
2077748
[Extra] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC9051 (6826)[Extra] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC9051 (6826)
RFC Errata System
2023-07-28
extra
None
/arch/msg/extra/EMCQjqV_V3VGzZCUFpAsDFRoTT8/
3335851
2076362
Re: [Emailcore] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-06.txtRe: [Emailcore] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-06.txt
Dave Crocker
2023-07-27
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/pqrZQ4o3huFy86mC-gNG6jh6E38/
3335464
2076024
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Any slides for Friday’s session?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Any slides for Friday’s session?
Wei Chuang
2023-07-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/em6l-pxVDU4gTbRV5oPLqEqO3r4/
3335113
2076065
Re: [Sml] New Version Notification for draft-pep-sml-auto-processing-marker-00.txt (fwd)Re: [Sml] New Version Notification for draft-pep-sml-auto-processing-marker-00.txt (fwd)
Bernie Hoeneisen
2023-07-14
sml
None
/arch/msg/sml/C8QXmML1tVgCNWpF9nSSs1JFZwE/
3330013
2069683
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD?
Seth Blank
2023-06-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/zz6pwFyvba0cdFV4PCmk_uiQZS4/
3323460
2071116
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Idle Musings - Why Is It DMARC and not DMARD?
Dotzero
2023-06-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/G_94Bj7k2kq-CNmarD3oSbb9e6c/
3323447
2071116
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9381 <draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-15> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9381 <draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-15> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-05-22
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/34XETtfK14EB8QinwdWh7Oa4Ldw/
3311250
2061639
Re: [E-impact] The "human-readable" delusionRe: [E-impact] The "human-readable" delusion
Toerless Eckert
2023-05-17
e-impact
None
/arch/msg/e-impact/Cait9Jku3OnR5FNS9T1rz8VrFZI/
3309937
2064898
I-D Action: draft-chuang-replay-resistant-arc-06.txtI-D Action: draft-chuang-replay-resistant-arc-06.txt
internet-drafts
2023-05-09
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/6uKIYCRQQU482TtOa7xzMiMazVU/
3307782
2064626
Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragmentation: 2023-05-03Re: [arch-d] IAB Technical Discussion on Fragmentation: 2023-05-03
Toerless Eckert
2023-05-04
architecture-discuss
None
/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/E0spltE_0rEn_oQE3a9zPSOvuGc/
3306811
2063357
Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection-14Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection-14
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2023-04-26
spasm
None
/arch/msg/spasm/4XaTFsm-To8sc8TGyEaJT0ZpLTo/
3304114
2060281