Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Todd Herr
2023-04-13
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/JVUdGoqJMXkPnaZuytzzNZ4bho4/
3299310
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Hector Santos
2023-04-13
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/TyilNhPnDvGmeAA1C2DCzHcSlMA/
3299199
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Douglas Foster
2023-04-13
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/WSBkMlp2IGztB7pcSDM8SMWtJTQ/
3299172
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-04-13
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/C9ruR3Ik0bxWrioBAldxVyP_YTs/
3299017
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-04-13
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KQNVG2u5PFPpFKzEID3YsVyApv4/
3299016
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be)Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be)
John R Levine
2023-04-13
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/svDDalBzDrqMRiwvh-TUQJ3aMAY/
3298979
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be)Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be)
Eric D. Williams
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3kAPQruoxcS_VhR226whxRFTupc/
3298967
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Hector Santos
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5c7pnERJwmvRCygOBLfNUipqzwc/
3298919
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Steven M Jones
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/AJ3GBWEJtCtcTWVcjmuyFChQ5Gg/
3298868
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Douglas Foster
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/DBnP2GUMr3saMBlgeMR-eowDtsk/
3298856
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Todd Herr
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KN9vUvMTKJvhbo2J41jvahPWdiI/
3298852
2060922
[dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs[dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/VkXMYR3YHwUNFhrlvI8dFZHrUR0/
3298829
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Y8KP6F_75VvofHuhr8Jk1D21poA/
3298816
2059017
[dmarc-ietf] Introducing DSAP/ATPS for Improved Email Authentication[dmarc-ietf] Introducing DSAP/ATPS for Improved Email Authentication
Hector Santos
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/sWcZAHkB9xTZcVUdpP4-4T793Yc/
3298814
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
John R Levine
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GarF3rrtcL_5_wlDCB7i7jIEvlE/
3298809
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Dotzero
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5BD_RBRbwor8j5L0H0reOsdzUQs/
3298808
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Hector Santos
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/4Xqz-VDVLFID9ThuO43OGG6fpUg/
3298761
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Brotman, Alex
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QUhTYXiTehvpYp1knrwCe6dtQ2Y/
3298730
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_AKBgnNe3NmxlE4IoPSOnkUCfuc/
3298667
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
John R Levine
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ECemJecZemnetEGesKQ1HvZawbA/
3298655
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MQou9eUflgkOuHkHxGvb0MyNI_g/
3298650
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expectedRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_UVZ8OSunwdvEQKvTRY-HcPPLJA/
3298604
2060004
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Brotman, Alex
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Dk-UHCgrxIHinFSfQY8D9dC6LXI/
3298599
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Laura Atkins
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/rTViUvcL04ROT3EDzBdKj6iBH3s/
3298576
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Douglas Foster
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/3W36sM0QFiLJs69V2WyHRfwXBCQ/
3298568
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Douglas Foster
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8-J1R02sk12mgRSnmMHlda0CrjI/
3298557
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Alessandro Vesely
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GPqLcsvmwluZXVG8vgT6AFMIpxY/
3298540
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Laura Atkins
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8bgrjqg9fOVkBS6IpVPqBAKDBZc/
3298539
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expectedRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected
Alessandro Vesely
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/c5m6mv7u0Z_85rm8oZ8AIFHyNlA/
3298525
2060004
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Alessandro Vesely
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Owy_LXzCQNjXRDNyoQQpCPXvflo/
3298521
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Alessandro Vesely
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/9xHQd9JG7cEjUBcCqCJx2-osuMs/
3298520
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expectedRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dMk_uHI66LP-dgt8qsCy4X_PqKg/
3298494
2060004
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expectedRe: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected
Alessandro Vesely
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CFk0FoiMFemvNIjQZfzC0gxIs6w/
3298475
2060004
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Neil Anuskiewicz
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/q6dEDdac00w151bhLspTSqOcrpE/
3298445
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-1zk0HF4ah7grlOomsSGcP4dfgg/
3298435
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/vXIBOucGFf_2Hr0S4KaSo2cIKg0/
3298428
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Neil Anuskiewicz
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LGcaFWMvB1gridjzZBFjJvQvblc/
3298425
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concernRe: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern
Neil Anuskiewicz
2023-04-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MM8OYIoWJ144c7zEMo3RW_pHaj8/
3298378
2060628
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concernRe: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern
Neil Anuskiewicz
2023-04-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GhGm3S33_BjVB-xU8nsJRRHjj1I/
3298347
2060628
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concernRe: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern
Neil Anuskiewicz
2023-04-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/laMu1psTbzzqv53AWT8Lo2EX0ZA/
3298311
2060628