Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Alessandro Vesely
2020-06-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SOyMGURvMA4MoLRPRWhJXYh9X_c/
2887071
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OMNNYo0OX6UhMYz5DSK10PaR4-A/
2886840
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Seth Blank
2020-06-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/WXL2jaNxsuIwDQSZWEqxMA1Rhyk/
2886836
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields DRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields D
Douglas E. Foster
2020-06-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/NTfkOOmfahJ2X5YEygHoFKNqEic/
2886838
1897787
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/FCThPgBnzKDWlEjBGb3g-BjhDgo/
2886825
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Seth Blank
2020-06-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/yllI_sxMQ535xEAltX9t760Eji4/
2886823
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QyaEtBysgQNRWBo1x9tKcC7e2Pw/
2886798
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Seth Blank
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/xXNetTP0Pm0fFFIpfCfGCcA1RbM/
2886795
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dotzero
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/geYc7IwWvtbPlYhBFBJHcrdKXyU/
2886791
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-yKn6YiFtA6qw_tjrKJjVFQDaIQ/
2886789
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Kurt Andersen (b)
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/JtT3gPUgMNFu20vPaCCXaLMAegY/
2886788
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/rCiQZxnIZgsZ2J0BGpZ_2s6HlZw/
2886778
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Seth Blank
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/i65GEThWbUG188XJHh_cFK6EhvE/
2886756
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Seth Blank
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MeSWgLwo7iLrjVCNJZSmu65NvZI/
2886752
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/yFb4pbYFFueZuF7D5Fy99Vglebo/
2886732
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Murray S. Kucherawy
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/6WccpkXgMIpYz6yRW4D172HIK5w/
2886724
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mU8srEScc5bpbtUZdsIl0c0Bd3g/
2886716
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Pete Resnick
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/vBV627YPNvq7jPq_WUD5Jde3SOs/
2886708
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KnQ7mENDfgiUMm52YfDZwvO7Afw/
2886686
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Pete Resnick
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/o06Zkq2nlNHeEmbjM3eRsMXxcH8/
2886681
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/xTmAoWDne8Vf-WCgxI3SE1rdTQw/
2886670
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dotzero
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/IFRVor2-qbYKNYEG9UtUkWsEe9o/
2886662
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Brandon Long
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/x-JxnmUBDU_pdu9f0bDY7w90sOA/
2886655
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/UkNtThMr-MoSFnA0r09dkB3Z7KI/
2886652
1897725
[dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields[dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Jesse Thompson
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hmFf-GmHAmS0Vwk9OJ2oYBhRmQU/
2886647
1897725
[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 108[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 108
IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
2020-05-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7v8lUEV_YyDufQjM_3804pom0ng/
2885370
1897240
[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 108[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 108
IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
2020-05-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LtChVb6V1hJvKzI91tr3XGNZLiE/
2885369
1897239
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Alessandro Vesely
2020-05-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LAtSdk_QUvuADqN7JBeNRK_JGcc/
2882432
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?
Dotzero
2020-05-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/9dxRxowFXlGsTxk8GBDtbt4tf-0/
2882305
1895194
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Scott Kitterman
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/git-BUc_QXQ3C38KZZQ1OtNmEIA/
2882277
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
John R. Levine
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CIrBvDSWq67SdKtvE7zBvuh2Zv8/
2882258
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Steven M Jones
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MOregu-6Rj5hwwp2lclSrptO68w/
2882257
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Todd Herr
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Q1v0cJbFMhh0gmVYt8yHEYu4HSc/
2882249
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?
Tim Wicinski
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nmu_WGXREo8Ji200BbJ7gNpjyQs/
2882232
1895194
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Scott Kitterman
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/B7tPRrwQ2oC1iBdK0OvZ8kGo1zI/
2882221
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Tim Wicinski
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ffy0YRtyrJWgEbBIlqS6RVlfNec/
2882217
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Alessandro Vesely
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/VGTEpCY7wGPGIL-l0JPZJkuocI0/
2881989
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Freddie Leeman
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/orI8w214rW2qnLYUNtVwG4c1xqE/
2881909
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Seth Blank
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/IsVdgLr9E0dShOk-P5nC90a5ZLU/
2881748
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Scott Kitterman
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/V8_qTZJwN6xWyrcGAfNPUUBHTGY/
2881699
1895196