Re: [dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16Re: [dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
Seth Blank
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/XBnlvNkeCDJurqFC_c_i2luS_sM/
2618709
1799027
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedilyRe: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedily
Seth Blank
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Eng5xpooUXmpCZUoU6ZrpA1D54k/
2618707
1798000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Tim Draegen
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/tbM1x4X28bQJxUtQs4TwRnqZcUQ/
2618673
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Kurt Andersen (b)
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/cX_C7axjtr8Rn8YitFJznRDAEvQ/
2618599
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16Re: [dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
Dave Crocker
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Hclrv9JY7CLVR9PXbDLeG1nDKNs/
2618587
1799027
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedilyRe: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedily
Brandon Long
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/8UQDH6dq6moLRd8Q9uWg8IJvSs0/
2618585
1798000
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC on ARC-16[dmarc-ietf] WGLC on ARC-16
Brandon Long
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fyUJ5WlRV3Thk5BS2k63x-4evLA/
2618584
1799234
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedilyRe: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedily
John R Levine
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MEUiLNIvmgfo12lOX3_Arr1nVa8/
2618582
1798000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedilyRe: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedily
Brandon Long
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1LUmj0yXW29uYZhNxpHJmO6Dznk/
2618573
1798000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16Re: [dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
Brandon Long
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SL0C2gAPTnVIm7NxURSCkneosW0/
2618571
1799027
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Dave Crocker
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Hk5VPZyUGIvF1FtmgOFhUspNM5U/
2618523
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Seth Blank
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-tw_2Gew9bXvnqBUuTrS_rk8_7M/
2618517
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
John Levine
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/FUEGdV1B7QMJaDytKQTXkoh4-z8/
2618514
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Murray S. Kucherawy
2018-08-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7wMkhB-uJUeYmTHin1GGHiMHEdg/
2618457
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16Re: [dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
Seth Blank
2018-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ofA7gtwc4RUlq4DGNkJkXRybDxQ/
2618142
1799027
[dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16[dmarc-ietf] Additional review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
Dave Crocker
2018-08-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MwFgyLVQOoeufYe-6ljpDh3hcak/
2618045
1799027
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16.txtRe: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16.txt
Seth Blank
2018-08-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Fwdp4wpHRSFt_hwSnZLuLKsVvJI/
2617762
1796537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16.txtRe: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16.txt
Ken O'Driscoll
2018-08-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/2_NyfMfq9G3PJtdT80dQUBoaLM4/
2617721
1796537
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
Seth Blank
2018-08-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hN_1nkNtJATqXTPOZxlTcsseYkA/
2617706
1796558
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
A. Schulze
2018-08-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YqzQnax5G1KccpelKZ-_neOpFBw/
2617681
1796558
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Alessandro Vesely
2018-08-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QVnbwtzXe8OHGufwObG3WIb5nOc/
2617606
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
Seth Blank
2018-08-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/JIE2mCyFWYXDzxT_eFigWPcC4es/
2617424
1798727
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
John Levine
2018-08-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mqfbC-wwuwEB0NysUddUUQ1R8bo/
2617423
1798727
[dmarc-ietf] In support of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16[dmarc-ietf] In support of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16
Juan Altmayer Pizzorno
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Olz4plVq4Z_iUeHgt00to6h6HCU/
2617393
1798776
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
Seth Blank
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/vJ9ZV1EPyLRe5iylxfytR6VE_7U/
2617360
1798727
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
John Levine
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EqBpamheekzgIhxOEPp4vXVz6TI/
2617356
1798727
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
Seth Blank
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/9rUcR5u2HXby0zj_dCbtxmmiaWw/
2617333
1798727
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
John Levine
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/f5QNKeKPOCybuu-6O8rQ8ASjQiw/
2617331
1798727
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
Seth Blank
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/tBJM867GVl6Uai70PYPxqvk1UPQ/
2617320
1798727
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
John Levine
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7SUaWxqvYYri0hBYB4Ljh8nBT4M/
2617318
1798727
Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messagesRe: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
Seth Blank
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/boqh2P4bikzkxxcHYQsUlXQVcsY/
2617296
1798727
[dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages[dmarc-ietf] ARC-16 and EAI messages
John R Levine
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/gzmohs-Zd7nGBqm5dKr2Ese1cYM/
2617293
1798727
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Murray S. Kucherawy
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hJtW3cHTeAsTfiPU0TN6RMAWTGQ/
2617119
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Alessandro Vesely
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/4ZymScuaK-hsxeYlmCsDnCGaJBU/
2617097
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedilyRe: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedily
John R Levine
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Kn0uj36K4ErgY6HiuMK96lslQkA/
2616949
1798000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedilyRe: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedily
Seth Blank
2018-07-31
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/FYINSqPvt3ha57WXKjclI3UzKVM/
2616941
1798000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Tim Draegen
2018-07-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wNoTa3FJHY_VfDp0Rklkh7S9yD4/
2616896
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedilyRe: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedily
John Levine
2018-07-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/pWglMjxdSNrcSs6yJR1EFhaSVRU/
2616892
1798000
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-02
Murray S. Kucherawy
2018-07-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fmDb119BPidLhNnaGth6xDhEWQk/
2616864
1795925
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedilyRe: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC ARC-16 concern on Section 5.1.2 - cv=fail should sign greedily
Seth Blank
2018-07-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/e6td-7_Zie9m4n6WIVa7IZVIHcI/
2616846
1798000