[dnsext] Terminological precision (was: the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?)[dnsext] Terminological precision (was: the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?)
Andrew Sullivan
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/5u9eyf-TjpbjXMgGfZbvgR7mcB4/
369573
1127749
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Eric Brunner-Williams
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/MV4cEL3HzGNCtgyE7fNS3u-e7cI/
369572
1127749
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Ted Hardie
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/3TWawrUsRFms76HH6c3c3Tvyt2s/
369571
1127749
[dnsext] How to bring discussion to a close (was: I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt)[dnsext] How to bring discussion to a close (was: I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt)
Andrew Sullivan
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ixGJFt4VW-pTMZvC0dRIYiK3RKI/
369570
1127739
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/WSCohFpYw01S72-HORti5EAEtKY/
369569
1127739
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/esksvvrcSyHyeuUQx7tBouSM7hI/
369568
1127739
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Paul Vixie
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/aCV-ii0-32ZAxlrQ7sfS42x4Tak/
369567
1127739
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Eric Brunner-Williams
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/a1h6aA7k6eVOdndB8LWt3kyqWIA/
369566
1127749
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Dan Schlitt
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/cqmllfe_h54XtWK7FKUo6-2yFZ8/
369565
1127739
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Ted Hardie
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/zZSDlQsoTVGxvurdzDSimtQm3xw/
369564
1127749
[dnsext] DNSEXT at IETF 80[dnsext] DNSEXT at IETF 80
Andrew Sullivan
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/T5imNyS3anUJ9WFlxuPTXhiU9HY/
369563
1127736
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Edward Lewis
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/IZgyRFcKQ_FFwx7dXVlqoerQkpQ/
369562
1127737
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/cIEL-A2h6YvLNsrzYVOZZZASea0/
369561
1127749
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Paul Hoffman
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/3UvCxtnP6HcdTFxUt1KiiZbUmaE/
369560
1127739
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/h79sTInPWROOYsjBTi0Imrji44A/
369559
1127739
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Stephane Bortzmeyer
2011-02-28
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/RQ1NwmMmONRQhTa7rBjoq01iQic/
369558
1127739
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Paul Vixie
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/2pFyFEyzHYNgyVTqDIL6hhIbOj4/
369557
1127737
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
John Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ZBaN9UZ7LH3puMNXKFwRk1nXvmc/
369556
1127737
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Patrik Fältström
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/BXVd_SOR9yitryfvK2M8bh_HzSU/
369555
1127739
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
John R. Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/vsKXjdg3NbR7-KHLjQEa8uztiyY/
369554
1127749
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Alex Bligh
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/JvWAIULwX-loUZNGWRvxtAvzzE0/
369553
1127749
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Paul Vixie
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/lgO98qSSFzeedPgxx5aQQMQNRfQ/
369552
1127737
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
John Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/kAw5o7mXarNO-P0uas-caIxIrvA/
369551
1127739
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
John R. Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/eQTpfvhrNznGKDiZLjFgtYsECtw/
369550
1127749
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Alex Bligh
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/yhh4CFB4LBn3-KjkLSL1NEk0PyI/
369549
1127749
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
John Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Y26metgrTn4zWvW1L3StkWFh4uA/
369548
1127749
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
John Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/GUONE_naYjxPOisZx1qlXJwfe1E/
369547
1127737
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
John Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/1FjEgwz3ZbLVm4YUr0nAvWsqQfo/
369546
1127749
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Xe-NCXAJEhlkBUF6zRfiWPyeojY/
369545
1127749
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
John Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/s6OjIFogiGTF-3TmDpxkFbxJfN0/
369544
1127749
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Edward Lewis
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/H1nAhaHOKoLVdxJtj7o18nTpA3U/
369543
1127737
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Edward Lewis
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/pvK5Od2fG3QBBkF5AdUT7wdoR-k/
369542
1127737
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/5qqvDpJ3NzvL1kdvG3cEM2uXhIw/
369541
1127749
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/4x8X2II-1k-_7L3VBvBAKfAlY1g/
369540
1127737
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
John Levine
2011-02-27
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/STRLK1Hi9CgaIq2mmcdUK11YSPs/
369539
1127749
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Mark Andrews
2011-02-26
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/CmNlPAOFinq0YVDzeow4QaKGzU8/
369538
1127737
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Edward Lewis
2011-02-26
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/7y7V1mcYoxkXKVZJOxjT_e9nhe0/
369537
1127737
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-02-26
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/_ctwMDYdd0oTsmZiYySIvTVU_3w/
369536
1127739
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2011-02-26
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Okvn8ZktFDkZdx4Jyk6ENKuu3aA/
369535
1127737
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Mark Andrews
2011-02-26
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/4ZGBfg1yZ9TunASJE_gZ3K8iL_E/
369534
1127737