Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Viktor Dukhovni
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/JjO8VD0TlJY1Mh9tiKIdYzZgrhU/
1924303
1339647
Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Massimiliano Pala
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/jwgtd3ZBuJwwKjTeA7Z7t5voGFk/
1924232
1339647
Re: Generalist ADs?Re: Generalist ADs?
joel jaeggli
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/xjE3tvb6uW3tMEjXad5M3ub-cg8/
1924230
1339650
Re: Generalist ADs?Re: Generalist ADs?
Keith Moore
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/1E1sG_PTiW5tEdEcE95PRS9zSI8/
1924227
1339650
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Keith Moore
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/93Gi4rbqxDmWlEJeh6hP8x-mRBM/
1924223
1339649
Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Leif Johansson
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/oX48j_K3oqxIRBv_vT3saymnXCQ/
1924217
1339647
Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/GBEuQyeJOgMo-BF49o1N7NNFPzw/
1924210
1339647
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Keith Moore
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Sn1LEzgb6Uhoy0CwV4UHrRkBba8/
1924203
1339649
Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Stephen Farrell
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/hXlHXkN5s2J0e9dp76mOBt1o1X8/
1924202
1339647
Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Thomas D. Nadeau
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/QjCTK8itNvNrwjiwszL7Np59izY/
1924192
1339647
Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Massimiliano Pala
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/P5GvRjUTRoTsAp4fAOQspyL0baY/
1924190
1339647
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Dave Cridland
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/n8-q0GffIcoN5HTuh15dOdf2Ag0/
1924167
1339649
Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/8YovNYRjApnclHGhi_j91Rt33VY/
1924153
1339647
Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsUse of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Massimiliano Pala
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/vMTFEzDkCeHj3DgWnKQaFjjiw30/
1924145
1339647
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/jTb66W28ZpK6NPPIxAoJ47k-WTk/
1924143
1339649
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
l.wood
2015-03-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/3EYFDBC2Zil-FlWI-3vQiofe7lE/
1924108
1339649
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/D-MGYbggrmfNHxiRnzStmIAPZCE/
1924023
1339649
IETF 93 - Registration is Now Open!IETF 93 - Registration is Now Open!
IETF Secretariat
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/JQ0QGvEkrkNXpSr74NOpGIeakYo/
1923988
1339648
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Larry Masinter
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/g7qqcOa9HaX9PpN1uDYqjt9p9Gc/
1923761
1339649
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Dave Cridland
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/pHx-OQljtLPqlPjRb4xbS2rjQ30/
1923545
1339649
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
t.p.
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/x1aIOtGCtdgxLCih-G9-cE4UkqM/
1923529
1339649
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.orgWeekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Thomas Narten
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/WdeCV0eIA0U-O9U1EHD0T_VgTgs/
1923434
1338915
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/UPtewm_YIqexrdm7c7r2PsYQ7ls/
1923404
1339649
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Kathleen Moriarty
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/K4nU8liF6y-AOw0Qodu0_NW7qbY/
1923257
1339651
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Spencer Dawkins at IETF
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/VEupDRZMcGl8AjfS0ztiTYLWS4o/
1923255
1339651
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Black, David
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/061kYh12pVr8G45y2RAoKqVkEKI/
1923235
1339651
Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: [eX-bulk] : Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MErdD3hcPtXNuWPACYSpndTP1k8/
1924800
1339652
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Dave Cridland
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/yTGXU_7ejDQgkRFMYirk82d_-is/
1923169
1339649
Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal)Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal)
Mary Barnes
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sTidkvZ0yipXrmD8HXNcqRe7NAw/
1923168
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/2iVhm1Xkwt_10VxPwElzyJ-YwaI/
1923134
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ErYOM5X-Npmki9zHkmXc-rGfRd8/
1923116
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Michael Richardson
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/L1IoJsDaE9vTzHEl9J4COE8wcWA/
1923061
1339652
Re: Generalist ADs?Re: Generalist ADs?
Abdussalam Baryun
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/kBiF51SYTX9ERSIQw-XqMfWLlgk/
1923004
1339650
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Alia Atlas
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Nzzjmhbd_Bmy5SF8HtilawNwE8M/
1922974
1339651
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/nd5JI6hkpo9lQTu4RMv6xmQqRIY/
1922953
1339649
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Brian E Carpenter
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/O4T89_p1oTQ8kGk4xW5u7PJqp-M/
1922940
1339651
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Lee Howard
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Kr7QZxWYSId8YkWRWx6nbv8Yod0/
1922908
1339652
DNSSEC change on IETF web pagesDNSSEC change on IETF web pages
IETF Chair
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Aofk3Dw4dOejMnFd21URbFP-gx0/
1922904
1339701
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Michael Richardson
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/WC_yWzIiI2flBnwARfbI-18ykmA/
1922823
1339649
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/BLFXbr7Bm83XkQABD73w0LO8Yvo/
1922777
1339651
40 Messages