Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Chris Lewis
2008-11-15
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/K4zEmw-GGcGgtMI0CKs2WZvHxec/
622467
1343693
Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Theodore Tso
2008-11-15
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/jF_I6k3Obd8aw_4inTRGSn0PoDg/
622466
1343693
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Theodore Tso
2008-11-15
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/6kYhaE5F9dkjli2VT3eV566xT6o/
622465
1343693
Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
Florian Weimer
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/rk7_9jBe5JxwVuukc1soZuiCkfI/
622464
1343707
Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Douglas Otis
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/dVbhrBUTUH3vooV0faVp6R454YY/
622463
1343693
Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Ted Hardie
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/FNjhfZ1ChuVub7pqNkgBUuuu3qE/
622462
1343693
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Al Iverson
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/1IUUB_7EWZx-FVT-qI1-EBGE6Yo/
622461
1343693
RE: several messagesRE: several messages
michael.dillon
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/cAKcl9HXKyVYTW02PK1y8qTGA3k/
622460
1343693
Re: several messagesRe: several messages
Al Iverson
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/5qNpa30TQ2fGk2DvLmo2Rnma_k8/
622459
1343693
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Keith Moore
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/iieIgJtKxJ1h3nNje1-86GsPKIQ/
622458
1343693
Re: several messagesRe: several messages
Chris Lewis
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/cRJurJH7NmoOknpowX8-NXhgDds/
622457
1343693
Re: several messagesRe: several messages
John C Klensin
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/CHlnORzMz1YOeahYbLzEhA8mXkM/
622456
1343693
RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
michael.dillon
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/m28gRIpoHC0DYc-WDCkE5V36mo8/
622455
1343693
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Al Iverson
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/63So7kr7CG8vy7giRUnRbH0JPOI/
622454
1343693
RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
michael.dillon
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4_p3vn9dn-3gD_0n5EGZyGwn7L4/
622453
1343693
Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
John L
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/CyrNLqozxl10a-zeDMk6J8fadDY/
622452
1343693
Re: several messagesRe: several messages
Al Iverson
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/LwTQoLhmVkxFOL9_OG8VjojAbDQ/
622451
1343693
Re: several messagesRe: several messages
John C Klensin
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/1xaMDZEB_yN8xAtD5KYkFBnEhyU/
622450
1343693
Re: Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?Re: Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?
Henning Schulzrinne
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/EkytIlTv7iWboD4Z4M8n79OLyfc/
622449
1343687
Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-09.txtGen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-09.txt
Spencer Dawkins
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/fJUkriTW21tCfCsOSFiq_D7jPa0/
622448
1344110
Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
SM
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/D-58lRtlWiZ1cUnqbJJh6p3WHdU/
622447
1343692
Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Keith Moore
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/6bz-4dw90gyrYe3DSkPGMSmjhVk/
622446
1343692
RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Ted Hardie
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/k04BXA3Plur1bpVkBcSMhpen0_k/
622445
1343693
Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Ted Hardie
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/uJxmOwShYGf3C9BhErvF7WdIYSc/
622444
1343693
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Keith Moore
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/WuR4_TeiLnWTJWvoZtnr2L6z9aY/
622443
1343692
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Al Iverson
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MYdhRJb-klVl1KsDjcUyMh2X4FE/
622442
1343693
RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
michael.dillon
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/5dUcPL4lVKDNm7DzFH1hz-C1pzU/
622441
1343692
adm plea: avoid/reduce massive cross-posting? (was: Can we have on NAT66 discussion?)adm plea: avoid/reduce massive cross-posting? (was: Can we have on NAT66 discussion?)
Lixia Zhang
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/puH1tp7Xls4LredTiZeDWnvqltg/
622440
1343692
RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/BwktELjYKznlJYYwfluxDSrV19w/
622439
1343692
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Margaret Wasserman
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/8yhPrTBPIv5rVu4c-CXb0zWoJKs/
622438
1343692
FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/XTFkNhunQLEVJFBWuyoOfZk2OM0/
622437
1343692
Re: Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?Re: Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?
Fred Baker
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/scqppoRUnIv4kT3FYxCrpzHIL38/
622436
1343687
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed StandardRe: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
Aaron Stone
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4jwnf2ua1gz0V-RGfZX3LL7aAf8/
622435
1343854
RE: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussionRE: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion
Song Haibin
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/hdQA-J9j4yduhOFf2brgrsmoe6Q/
622433
1343696
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Eric Klein
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/kRRw9aZ98jJepXLmnxzHUC9-ho4/
622434
1343692
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Rich Kulawiec
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/xU8hfG7BUBPQ12BIUw5Du3O6O90/
622432
1343693
Re: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussionRe: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion
Bruce Lowekamp
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/dlb7Cuzs4YUjMf9Io5RFHZLuLdM/
622431
1343696
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Eric Klein
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/I7Kcf4Rp_LlK2J063NCwYc2v6u8/
622429
1343692
RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Darrel Lewis (darlewis)
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/bmKb2RsUa0ANRo3_70Dr6y3C1u0/
622430
1343692
Re: several messagesRe: several messages
Rich Kulawiec
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/UBn0TKglAWc88yVYgirbd1d2pWU/
622428
1343693