Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 14 November 2008 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1C63A6AB6; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:02:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCA53A6A95 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:01:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id InD5TGyRo8iv for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:01:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1.imap-partners.net (m1.imap-partners.net [64.13.152.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDD93A6A98 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:01:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lust.indecency.org ([72.242.14.237]) by m1.imap-partners.net (MOS 3.10.3-GA) with ESMTP id BEK35609 (AUTH admin@network-heretics.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:01:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <491DD91A.5090507@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:01:30 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Al Iverson <aiverson@spamresource.com>
Subject: Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
References: <e0c581530811140931t23f85aa9w9629a8aa2bc9f26@mail.gmail.com> <C0F2465B4F386241A58321C884AC7ECC0961B8DB@E03MVZ2-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net> <e0c581530811141103y1b831a2ag396bd06823db08cf@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e0c581530811141103y1b831a2ag396bd06823db08cf@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Al Iverson wrote:

> Is this unique to DNSBLs? If not, then why does it merit deeper
> consideration in the context of DNSBLs?

what you are arguing is that rather than trying to address the harm done
by DNSBLs, IETF should ignore that harm by ruling it out of scope for
the current discussion.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf