Re: several messages

David Romerstein <romer@hanov3r.com> Wed, 12 November 2008 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3299D3A6834; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:40:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF3D28C1A5 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:40:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTYScSNQdR7q for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:40:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toro.popovich.net (toro.popovich.net [66.207.166.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4AA3A63EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:40:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toro.popovich.net (toro [127.0.0.1]) by toro.popovich.net (8.14.2/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mACKeQq0032178 for <ietf@ietf.org> env-from (romer@hanov3r.com); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:40:26 -0800
Received: from localhost (romer@localhost) by toro.popovich.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id mACKeQ6v032175 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:40:26 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: toro.popovich.net: romer owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:40:26 -0800
From: David Romerstein <romer@hanov3r.com>
X-X-Sender: romer@toro.popovich.net
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: several messages
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0811121521271.4831-100000@citation2.av8.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121232540.8743@toro.popovich.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0811121521271.4831-100000@citation2.av8.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

[roughly 37 bajillion To: addresses removed]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Dean Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, David Romerstein wrote:

>> If they don't notice the dropped subscription, I'd say they're not
>> negatively impacted.
>
> Hmm. Wonder if you'd say the same if it was your bank account, or your
> house robbed: "Gee your honor, I waited and waited, and nobody noticed,
> so it must be ok to take his money and possessions."

You do realize that, in this context, your 'argument' makes no sense, 
right?

> The point is that, someday, long after the opportunity to participate
> has passed, they find out they've been dropped.

I'm on many mailing lists. I participate in all of them. I am aware of the 
approximate volume of mail I get from them everyday, at least by orders of 
magnitude. If a list that normally sees 20-30 emails a day doesn't have 
any for a day, I'm likely to start investigating. That may make me 
unusual; based on my experiences blocking spam at A Large ISP several 
years ago, though, I suspect that I am not. People complain to their 
postmasters *vociferously* when expected mail is not received, and that 
shows that those emails have value to them.

-- D
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf