IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Wed, 19 November 2008 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A93A3A698F; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:42:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B6A3A69D9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m3DPpzAWrrtg for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.235]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033463A6808 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f17so2944123qba.41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=gkWM8s761KUNKE1fMIc1u1i5eS17uuHL9V5Dt5o6oX0=; b=bGQFQOI4Dt6BpsN3p31kgOib7wwA+kCQLBA+RQnMsZ6zWtseQ5JDZfDXk/AGuLGWSf PEQ0cmggmar3pmI76CQKO5qA5eRqTQGa86yYkNRFZw9pi7t2kgosnmHTrPLn9lh13jhh ytDillM35N/eIcm4nzSBqFnDhSxIi+FguFGeY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=LbTUkeI9wx9Na+yevZX0a7sudHz6PSuN+2Yua1T6g3mbKcrdvtlpurXUv0HYeBRzfP VlOJ0zeO5jsPREM420wfjgxMP7Eqzidl9dTHryD5C7W2w+8K6y1tdhmrEgoIRv1TNgax Qiu2Q0fVe3rO40YjKY/Tz5oB4OvnLvO5QINLE=
Received: by 10.181.225.6 with SMTP id c6mr23831bkr.207.1227030400342; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.211.19 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60811180946k71b8703flc4056f90350ef6fd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:46:40 -0600
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: YAO <healthyao@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
In-Reply-To: <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net> <008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org> <B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com> <20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org> <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:42:21 -0800
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1864747032=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

No good can come of this thread.

How about we wait a few months and see what happens after the fourth branch
of government becomes part of the executive branch again on Jan 20th?

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:24 AM, YAO <healthyao@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04#section-2.3
>
> which said "
>
> 2.3.  Freedom of Participation
>
>   Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could
>   be disallowed entry or where freedom of speech is not guaranteed for
>   all participants.
> "
>
> My question is :"
>
> Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
> draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria as IETF Meeting Venue ?"
>
> It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf meeting when
> ietf is held in USA this time or other times
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>



-- 
Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
http://dotcrimemanifesto.com

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email