Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com> Thu, 13 November 2008 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075373A697E; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD96F3A697E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id esQdgeEzaGbz for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09DD3A694F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=hardie@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1226603972; x=1258139972; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:to: from:subject:content-type:x-ironport-av; z=MIME-Version:=201.0|Message-ID:=20<p06240604c5422df815d4 @[10.227.68.106]>|In-Reply-To:=20<491C7A2B.3030503@leisi. net>|References:=20<Pine.LNX.4.33.0811121942450.12067-100 000@egate.xpasc.com>=0D=0A=20<20081113112302.38928.qmail@ simone.iecc.com>=0D=0A=20<e0c581530811130740g1db5cbfehbcd ad361660bf48b@mail.gmail.com>=0D=0A=20<491C5339.8090801@d crocker.net>=09<20081113163833.GN76118@shinkuro.com>=0D =0A=20<491C699B.4000702@nortel.com>=09<20081113180841.GO7 6118@shinkuro.com>=0D=0A=20<491C711C.3030605@leisi.net> =20<20081113183919.GR76118@shinkuro.com>=0D=0A=20<491C7A2 B.3030503@leisi.net>|Date:=20Thu,=2013=20Nov=202008=2011: 19:47=20-0800|To:=20Matthias=20Leisi=20<matthias@leisi.ne t>,=20IETF=20<ietf@ietf.org>|From:=20Ted=20Hardie=20<hard ie@qualcomm.com>|Subject:=20Re:=20uncooperative=20DNSBLs, =20was=20several=20messages|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B =20charset=3D"us-ascii"|X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee=3Bi =3D"5300,2777,5433"=3B=20a=3D"12856487"; bh=B0SrPObYcb6SUfSZVzcVBPTDoc/GBrBbjQwH0z3m77A=; b=wbWUSTUAWqTLMXkBmb0CvUU8vYVCCAHsnOka8RMmbKhspvnu95/Jnd4f vOX+GCWNu78lLznRsZbdGL09GHQJxfH8PBD8kJ8u3d7/6LUBmELMSOVB7 lHEzAPeBytyjugPDJxyntHneDMflfD2+6fauj+pP6HxUSDAEVi7UvPZlH Q=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5433"; a="12856487"
Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO numenor.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Nov 2008 11:19:32 -0800
Received: from msgtransport01.qualcomm.com (msgtransport01.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.148]) by numenor.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id mADJJVjV001253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:32 -0800
Received: from nasanexhub02.na.qualcomm.com (nasanexhub02.na.qualcomm.com [10.46.143.120]) by msgtransport01.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id mADJJVTo009551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:31 -0800
Received: from nasanexmsp01.na.qualcomm.com (10.45.56.204) by nasanexhub02.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.143.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:31 -0800
Received: from [10.227.68.106] (10.46.82.6) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (10.45.56.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.291.1; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:30 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <p06240604c5422df815d4@[10.227.68.106]>
In-Reply-To: <491C7A2B.3030503@leisi.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0811121942450.12067-100000@egate.xpasc.com> <20081113112302.38928.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <e0c581530811130740g1db5cbfehbcdad361660bf48b@mail.gmail.com> <491C5339.8090801@dcrocker.net> <20081113163833.GN76118@shinkuro.com> <491C699B.4000702@nortel.com> <20081113180841.GO76118@shinkuro.com> <491C711C.3030605@leisi.net> <20081113183919.GR76118@shinkuro.com> <491C7A2B.3030503@leisi.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:47 -0800
To: Matthias Leisi <matthias@leisi.net>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

At 11:04 AM -0800 11/13/08, Matthias Leisi wrote:
>The suggestion to use a dedicated RRTYPE is nice, but many others have
>failed in this endeavour before.
>
>-- Matthias


What do you mean "failed in this endeavour"?  failed to get an RR
assigned, or failed in deployment?

				regards,
					Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf