IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: several messages

"Al Iverson" <aiverson@spamresource.com> Thu, 13 November 2008 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EE23A68F2; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:46:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A393A68F2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:46:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ZF1LqenOGk4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E493A6803 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so603926fga.41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.86.58.3 with SMTP id g3mr1567114fga.71.1226551600030; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.86.31.12 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e0c581530811122046y12d7f22i4ad4fcd9b3704507@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:46:39 -0500
From: Al Iverson <aiverson@spamresource.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: several messages
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0811122032010.12067-100000@egate.xpasc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e0c581530811122025q77beb970s32792b12bebd01cf@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0811122032010.12067-100000@egate.xpasc.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:37 PM, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Al Iverson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:08 PM, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In the end, walking isn't a viable alternative.
>>
>> Because it's so hard to open a Gmail account? I think your thinking
>> here is about two generations out of date. Back in 1995 when we each
>> had our one dialup account, and webmail was much less common and
>> acceptable, your point would have been more valid.
>
> C'mon ... my example contractor has printed collateral, web pages, etc.
> all with his email address. Changing an email address is non-trivial for
> folks who don't have any need to register their own domain name. Even
> those who have a web serving domain often have no business need for
> email.

The professional who has printed their AOL.com email address on their
business card has problems that are far greater than, and not unique
to, an ISP's use of DNSBLs.

Regards,
Al Iverson
-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com   --   Chicago, IL, USA
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email