IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

Jim Hill <ietf@mx.rdns.org> Thu, 13 November 2008 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E0028C0F7; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:42:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5ECD28C0F0 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:42:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guURoNBNEElh for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:42:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rdns.org (mail.rdns.org [217.151.101.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B3D3A67AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:42:37 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=mx; d=mx.rdns.org; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Reply-To:Message-Id:Content-Type; b=AvxdKZHJfVLCaYLR54SaBHG9g4K/lb9iLFpCDRgF8/8iVdGHTtjI5W2BQbkM7Ng4aGsQnUJVAXNdt sXcO841QocP7x/4FKNdfbgNPvK8Itkm0+aP/v12Qp663Kfe89Qh3VZ5BnDHQpFtfyd5VfTyzElEdyKZ1 CsYSC3lqM7ocA0=;
Received: from ltp.rdns.org ( [217.151.101.99]) by mail.rdns.org with ESMTP (Mailtraq/2.10.0.2176) id MLRD90098434 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:42:18 -0000
From: Jim Hill <ietf@mx.rdns.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:42:18 +0000
Message-ID: <492062a4.102272968@mid.rdns.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0811121942450.12067-100000@egate.xpasc.com> <20081113112302.38928.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <491f1ea6.84867359@mid.rdns.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811130905170.8743@toro.popovich.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811130905170.8743@toro.popovich.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

David Romerstein in
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0811130905170.8743@toro.popovich.net>:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Jim Hill wrote:
> 
> > That seems to satisfy all the requirements for removal listed at
> > <http://www.us.sorbs.net/faq/dul.shtml>
> 
> I believe that it's listed 'correctly', per that FAQ, for one reason:
> 
> [romer@toro mail]$ dig 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa
> 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa. 86265 IN     CNAME   email.xpasc.com.
> 
> CNAME, not PTR. SORBS *appears* to want PTRs (with appropriate TTLs).

There is a delegated ptr-record ... 

| dig ptr 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa
| 
| ;; ANSWER SECTION:
| 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa. 59754 IN     CNAME   email.xpasc.com.
| email.xpasc.com.        59754   IN      PTR     email.xpasc.com.

The ttl seems to be ok as well (ignore the above from my cache).
-- 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email