IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 traffic stats

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Wed, 12 November 2008 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E76D28C197; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:26:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC5728C197 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:26:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FE695ZlrOsnV for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:26:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC7B28C174 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:26:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.194] (static-167-138-7-89.ipcom.comunitel.net [89.7.138.167] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mACKPRHj057901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:25:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <3F862D65-F75D-4D3E-A977-969436D6B7CB@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <65E18582-8F1C-4A54-B03D-AA637B79347A@tcb.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Subject: Re: IPv6 traffic stats
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:26:02 +0100
References: <08111108201165.2a71d.487911088@oregon.uoregon.edu> <20081111185711.GG1588@nsn.com> <4919ED2F.2020101@alvestrand.no> <f1110c510811111249ud4ee387m2169fb84378ec3f4@mail.gmail.com> <4919FA68.4030803@alvestrand.no> <65E18582-8F1C-4A54-B03D-AA637B79347A@tcb.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 12 nov 2008, at 21:17, Danny McPherson wrote:

> Indeed, and according to the same stats,

> • 0.238% of users have useful IPv6 connectivity (and prefer IPv6)
> • 0.09% of users have broken IPv6 connectivity

> Nearly 38% of that .238% is broken...

No, 0.238% is the working IPv6 users, so the total is 0.328% of which  
27% is broken. I would be interested to see the OS breakdown for that  
0.09%. I'm betting it's mostly Vista 6to4 users who have a public IPv4  
address but are behind a firewall that blocks protocol 41.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status