Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Mon, 10 November 2008 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E8A3A6A58; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:13:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EA028C0F5 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:13:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJWuw7bDaNuH for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:13:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1.imap-partners.net (m1.imap-partners.net [64.13.152.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1903A6A5F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:13:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (adsl-242-100-123.tys.bellsouth.net [74.242.100.123]) by m1.imap-partners.net (MOS 3.10.3-GA) with ESMTP id BEF34539 (AUTH admin@network-heretics.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:13:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <491879D3.5020907@network-heretics.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:13:39 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
References: <200811091733.MAA04258@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <200811091733.MAA04258@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Cc: mouse@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

der Mouse wrote:
> [Keith Moore]
>>> The fact that [DNSBLs] are widely used is sad, not a justification
>>> for standardization.
> 
> True.  The justification is not simply that they are widely used; it is
> that they are widely used, they are often done wrong, they are of
> tremendous value when done right, and of actively negative value when
> done wrong.

I agree that this might be a justification for standardizing some sort
of reputation protocol.  But it's not at all clear the document at hand
describes a protocol which is technically sound, and it certainly
doesn't have rough IETF consensus.  I'm willing to defer judgment about
whether such a protocol might reasonably resemble DNSxL, or whether it
can reasonably use DNS at all - but I have reason to doubt it.

Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf