Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)

John L <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 07 November 2008 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B8228C101; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:21:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2173A696D for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:21:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nzaWLkVTGbDT for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332243A67C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 13408 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2008 15:19:55 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (208.31.42.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 7 Nov 2008 15:19:55 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=t1108; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=1FR9ILBkguS08xPLQBtjjQqPjWGHxTF9S7odlDMH8WU=; b=Qsl9hJKBHL8lkYVJ7zcp+xKf91sNVq+h5+7aMfb7uU/dQ/aOBqkIjEICDCyrHyk32zPWMkRT/Wr5BgGx+hMG2KKNWcs02VJFIZR8kiLWkZFD120isuCWYvshDLLPkH60
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:19:55 +0000
From: John L <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
In-Reply-To: <20081107145257.GA28398@nic.fr>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0811071500240.89670@simone.iecc.com>
References: <20081107111744.GA31018@nic.fr> <20081107141821.79303.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <20081107145257.GA28398@nic.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> After "Each entry in the DNSxL MUST have an A record.", add "The A
> record MUST NOT be interpreted as an IPv4 address. It is an opaque
> value, whose presence simply means that the name or address queried is
> actually listed in the DNSxL."

Seems reasonable.

> No, it's just experience. The last funny case is inside France Telecom
> (French largest ISP) where one mail server refused another one because
> it was blacklisted :-)

Orange/Wanadoo/FT has a dreadful spam problem, so bad that I've locally 
had blacklist about half of their outbound mail servers.  If the point of 
the blacklist entry in question was to keep spam out of recipients' 
mailboxes, it was probably doing what it was supposed to.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf