Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRe: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
james woodyatt
2009-07-09
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/jsNkvaZWGnzvP302XwcGCmWh0YE/
625823
1343188
Panel at IETF 75 -- Securing the DNS: Towards a more secure InternetPanel at IETF 75 -- Securing the DNS: Towards a more secure Internet
Russ Housley
2009-07-09
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sOnR6S2UaBYvnZhDsqVN0j14pi8/
625821
1343181
RE: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document FormatRE: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format
Yaakov Stein
2009-07-09
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/a6t5g6EUMp1pt-d4GqQ5wVursGU/
625820
1343197
Re: Avoid unknown code sources (was: Re: RFC archival format)Re: Avoid unknown code sources (was: Re: RFC archival format)
Iljitsch van Beijnum
2009-07-09
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/EeoYR2FWE16g605XGkDb2vV-Y7w/
625819
1343188
Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF DocumentFormatRe: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF DocumentFormat
Dave Crocker
2009-07-09
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/dBbE1imnPB5Fu8pPwjX0HX850nQ/
625818
1343182
Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document FormatRe: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format
Russ White
2009-07-09
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/yM9e5vwT-cACnpQgEXiEK3qHKYs/
625822
1343197
Re: Avoid unknown code sources (was: Re: RFC archival format)Re: Avoid unknown code sources (was: Re: RFC archival format)
Douglas Otis
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/EdcLk54q87J0ULNhc-Aj7rGO50c/
625817
1343188
Nomcom 2009-2010: Final list of VolunteersNomcom 2009-2010: Final list of Volunteers
Mary Barnes
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/DBaFWRp21qtWx_aaspLJoj8cc8U/
625816
1343183
Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document FormatRe: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format
Dave CROCKER
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/QvCGpRq3PDyFP_0jdsH-49273qM/
625815
1343197
Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document FormatRe: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format
ned+ietf
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/w7FIfC56Wz3sF8eIRy1ylrFY-ho/
625814
1343197
Re: IANA ticketsRe: IANA tickets
Julian Reschke
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/HqcsP_D4Fz3B5vfIgEaNTsEfOGI/
625810
1343184
Re: IANA ticketsRe: IANA tickets
Michelle Cotton
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/f25FgvJQl9vRR4DYTz9l4cz9_DE/
625809
1343184
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
Wes Hardaker
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/mHojJwrEDkwDBnZ2ratRGjCswsw/
625813
1343197
Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRe: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
John C Klensin
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ArQ6QDYHKBE9Ek2ABTk4IONIy_U/
625808
1343197
Re: Possible TLP discussion listRe: Possible TLP discussion list
John C Klensin
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/3Y15-YYNWWJdnbP-DSVM7ibgJpw/
625807
1343195
IANA ticketsIANA tickets
Julian Reschke
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/WZ2v0JahWZlVLB4tA_W0wYaB8Bg/
625806
1343184
RE: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRE: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Dave Nelson
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/KOSpgpAFQSKaJkS0GXtImKhDOdg/
625805
1343197
RE: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETFRE: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF
Yaakov Stein
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MfLG1ilpKG336iQNGnmWxTSXP3E/
625804
1343197
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
Julian Reschke
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/bWuVI5TuNQGM_8A-ZFHciyscl8U/
625803
1343197
Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NAT Behavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFCRe: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NAT Behavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFC
Magnus Westerlund
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/jND88MZ7iQCB5UttPip-1hn6yu8/
625802
1343333
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
Mark Andrews
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/43-qeOALB-thPI8FYPJmbKI-ulU/
625801
1343197
Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRe: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Stefan Winter
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/qp6bjwhXXGsmkSnEdRC8ughlAJ8/
625800
1343197
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
Julian Reschke
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/3qSNpOixyAO882SnuaqaNHQJG5s/
625799
1343197
MS Word flame war (was: Re: RFC archival format)MS Word flame war (was: Re: RFC archival format)
Doug Ewell
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/m0p0BzZRw-yZuZu5vzxWaQkzYLc/
625798
1343188
Re: [BEHAVE] FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NATBehavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFCRe: [BEHAVE] FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NATBehavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFC
Bruce Lowekamp
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/eGQv716f_OlNx0Lpz7Kn2jnef_0/
625797
1343328
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NATBehavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFCRe: Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NATBehavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFC
Bruce Lowekamp
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/XGun7gvt8tRWPEHhuFZUarodxY4/
625796
1343328
Re: Security Review of draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery-06Re: Security Review of draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery-06
Bruce Lowekamp
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/FrLrpETqY4HCXdWeZeF7r8wju5I/
625795
1343259
Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NAT Behavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFCRe: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NAT Behavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFC
Bruce Lowekamp
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/m7ew0tBg1GWJqPeVTUIQwhtaOmU/
625794
1343333
Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRe: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
John C Klensin
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/hlWSqrh6wAKERii0e61I9PJInAg/
625793
1343197
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
Mark Andrews
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/C814oodrFUO-GfSpqbE3xeKPZcQ/
625792
1343197
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
Mark Andrews
2009-07-08
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/T72j7Kc6LoMZmX2ZbUMNjr5Z_EU/
625791
1343197
Re: Possible TLP discussion listRe: Possible TLP discussion list
Marshall Eubanks
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/k_PLubQTvTRXZdYm3jw69u2WL8s/
625790
1343195
Re: Possible TLP discussion listRe: Possible TLP discussion list
Bill Manning
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4voKyp3JGpqgGc1dBeAkxMBpX2E/
625789
1343195
RE: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRE: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Dave Nelson
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/pMZ7S9N4HAn6Lon7J_01WkC3ZEg/
625788
1343197
Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRe: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Tim Bray
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/2tLN2bvnw465yZve6xPm6S_GbrQ/
625787
1343197
Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRe: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Iljitsch van Beijnum
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/PKjsX5VDU4F83dRB7tTLCReCiBA/
625786
1343197
Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards requiredRe: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
John C Klensin
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/lh4dEqpljQnqEMkFa8tmrMUYDfk/
625785
1343197
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
Julian Reschke
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/UHX5YtWyTK4oE0JAHC-Iy2YugKc/
625784
1343197
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
Tony Hansen
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/8T1CM6SUKNugF0vF6RxYIcqNH4o/
625783
1343197
New IETF Journal available now (Volume 5, Issue 1)New IETF Journal available now (Volume 5, Issue 1)
Mirjam Kuehne
2009-07-07
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/yur_ejT3GpIKFkZp_R08CFhfkKk/
625782
1344119