Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/dQQos8wM20p3r7pdXb_DdFeLr9M/
3357089
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/fAuQ1dGbFFtNfaktVboDF_wlfXY/
3357076
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Michael Richardson
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/GUIT4lVTBvdPWfgpbwp0dbQahh4/
3356961
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Trøan
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/RXglWrak4GD6A-q_-dmH0vcxwow/
3356861
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ZWrDeeUevfnhfdoNyLjSPIvg31s/
3356858
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
David Farmer
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ifAaNxZlWAvrmaWqvlnRwk_j8qo/
3356837
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/tO23XWlSeXgbDO713yUo6U5uPws/
3356829
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Troan
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/THFiEQh2Jg8bQWr7uyg9bHeTkL4/
3356826
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/PYay52viJqyjAm6qh-XKT-x-bvY/
3356823
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Troan
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/xyj7h_Of_BBuB-Nyo7uraHG8MRw/
3356817
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Ku78x---42wUrODPjLpxF09bSYY/
3356816
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Mark Smith
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/6cf7FO4giF__zjmvHBLC9IgoLGA/
3356811
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/t_saPaQhFrkuI-SiV0ZuTkTvJUA/
3356754
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Ole Troan
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OdgtInpu2PRJaNoqWz-0WhZY2uk/
3356750
2079409
Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))Re: [IPv6] IPv6 doesn't have a business case (Re: IPv6+NAT is just bigger IPv4+NAT, and even less of a reason to adopt IPv6 (Re: NPT66 POC [WAS: Re: Best Source / Destination address pair [WAS: Best Address type (assuming God's view)]]))
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-09-18
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/W0Nv9pMuKZZgEbxF14_jCkfS_pw/
3356746
2079409
[IPv6] 464 CLAT in libc[IPv6] 464 CLAT in libc
Soni "They/Them" L.
2023-09-17
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/V2rK0DsVP1nor2x1Hfxf_TpdbLI/
3356670
2085049