Subject
From
Date
List
[jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field[jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Jim Schaad
2013-05-29
jose
/arch/msg/jose/nxWFja1Y1db_idWq2S4HIFtwJ4Q/
820420
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Richard Barnes
2013-05-29
jose
/arch/msg/jose/tEjrIa3yhvMCBr_O139ZxLEZecQ/
820421
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Jim Schaad
2013-05-29
jose
/arch/msg/jose/8L-Av4xrz6i3ZdqXwZEPxyuCk-M/
820426
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Dick Hardt
2013-05-29
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ARTc6uMfzKgWF4hvPFgzym6yCEk/
820422
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Jim Schaad
2013-05-29
jose
/arch/msg/jose/s2H0XozChpTfsbIrD1smwEcQStQ/
820425
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Dick Hardt
2013-05-29
jose
/arch/msg/jose/17j3w2xhe9NIlQQ76ztuRRN68TM/
820429
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Mike Jones
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/CdzzVXywUHg1iwdOENCbvGsIZf0/
820430
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Dick Hardt
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/XqPHJErLbPU8L2p_G30JuRjFPKo/
820431
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Mike Jones
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/fznT-qSrg7C7vqkWGvoN5Rr8Vd8/
820434
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Richard Barnes
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/rcCKBPIpOy-3cRBd2FK1fL7L1Pc/
820444
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Mike Jones
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/KZOgKePRjl-Iq65hgCpOAjMSC3I/
820447
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Richard Barnes
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/fFfDimAur-p5SrdvDiDmshcPLb8/
820456
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Mike Jones
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Aqy5W3Kyf3Fi-wFdJV9opM3ww5c/
820459
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Richard Barnes
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/PkH2LfpelrydX1fXBPihz25l6qg/
820462
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Mike Jones
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/dOfhy06qgyn3PB4UxfipvasZn3k/
820465
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Nat Sakimura
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/kJjvvCIwa_0pWrsIEMVrGYfauFk/
820467
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Brian Campbell
2013-05-31
jose
/arch/msg/jose/jErgbJlhzKeFaafu2rDmFmxYeWM/
820483
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Richard Barnes
2013-06-04
jose
/arch/msg/jose/euXqJJYSzPZ3mx4tME1LMmlxQWU/
820488
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Nat Sakimura
2013-06-05
jose
/arch/msg/jose/gEz9R8Q4S8G5js3GLMknHHLSrVw/
820490
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Richard Barnes
2013-06-05
jose
/arch/msg/jose/2JzXN3v_xndqSx1s49izpFDC_JU/
820492
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Nat Sakimura
2013-06-06
jose
/arch/msg/jose/R7xeKxoT1x9C2CdiCRms6BKsDNE/
820493
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Dick Hardt
2013-06-06
jose
/arch/msg/jose/5i2a1Tux05vGEhiJpSgMbENfYgY/
820494
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Nat Sakimura
2013-06-06
jose
/arch/msg/jose/XYVZ55O4ozvwmcNWsLmlWRfQG-k/
820495
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Axel.Nennker
2013-06-07
jose
/arch/msg/jose/JwONsry2baqRyO7cCDONrJOLiDA/
820500
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Jim Schaad
2013-06-10
jose
/arch/msg/jose/K_I6f2UoWws2s1HgKW4M0zuXIUw/
820512
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Manger, James H
2013-06-06
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Twg8cXD5EMJ5MRyQ5euFuEcXF5c/
820496
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
John Bradley
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/h3_SfDqrGMYtgYYxuwkFU0EhGes/
820468
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Jim Schaad
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/TI7B3TFKm73k6KKR9n4-5VVMALg/
820469
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Dick Hardt
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Gr8fatDz0QFAgbP3KhwS5p8oQbU/
820470
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Mike Jones
2013-06-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/1ovyDkqz1zKwy0GpoSgckrtrQeU/
820530
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Richard Barnes
2013-06-11
jose
/arch/msg/jose/U7rZ9sCsMULXFlnhTz4E92YqrMA/
820553
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Richard Barnes
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ydYdzK7fQBwmXPKG1k6YSmkAJxg/
820471
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Jim Schaad
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/5otlbF1qJXtpz5cGuU6dP9P88u4/
820460
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
John Bradley
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/JYl5Kv1TGcnT4ASVBtjk6axZnRU/
820432
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Dick Hardt
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/vKXuEC5ixE1JSRRL3I1BfbmV7_E/
820433
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Mike Jones
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Mn-h1cxHYwCJC2g8A-SYrmbv3uo/
820435
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
John Bradley
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/0zKwkvSVNWJPxRqrL6YS-95X9WU/
820437
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Dick Hardt
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/p-Rg4vpch8L5a3VT6lf_9lKlmcw/
820438
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
Mike Jones
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Ukb4R29ssKaGOD8DAPWH9GI0dQ0/
820439
1445328
Re: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header fieldRe: [jose] Should we delete the "typ" header field
John Bradley
2013-05-30
jose
/arch/msg/jose/5dvJBfD-O4-WUtgkcnyrJkIu6cw/
820441
1445328