[dnsext] Terminological precision (was: the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?)[dnsext] Terminological precision (was: the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?)
Andrew Sullivan
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/IHY0ra29w4tYEsSEKVaZSTEk4WM/
1006560
1505813
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Eric Brunner-Williams
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/KweynIK5OXZaYlizE1ovj0fIMnE/
1006559
1505813
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Ted Hardie
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/UbcRfRy_571Bl27iiVL8zmT-nys/
1006558
1505813
[dnsext] How to bring discussion to a close (was: I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt)[dnsext] How to bring discussion to a close (was: I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt)
Andrew Sullivan
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/8iMF27Eu5EKtFLLmRAaG0xSyRaI/
1006557
1505803
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/BpBCAAK0L-kTUP6euk-PlA44NDM/
1006556
1505803
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/sfbti7MruDRhk4NHRn5HIG240gc/
1006555
1505803
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Paul Vixie
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/wwaqCc8P2KQfOBTNywP7O2JO0aE/
1006554
1505803
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Eric Brunner-Williams
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Yhzshfgj9Iy7jHCPvykzlrLcgz4/
1006553
1505813
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Dan Schlitt
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/ZzKFo9Vj7x2PmCKt--5fnbZkQBs/
1006552
1505803
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Ted Hardie
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/r1B3310D-n6hdrCTJLk5_MLHgeM/
1006551
1505813
[dnsext] DNSEXT at IETF 80[dnsext] DNSEXT at IETF 80
Andrew Sullivan
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/MxXw_u7-fFnRowAl81E66zs-mEg/
1006550
1505800
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Edward Lewis
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/AtuhjAe_XDeK_o-DA_fledj5hKo/
1006549
1505801
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/6z2Hk-xofFRCifJSmDD6jTeG0LE/
1006548
1505813
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Paul Hoffman
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/4f-J5DKBhKldSuwF56g8pHk7cEg/
1006547
1505803
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/-FIDTlPrzs8-UT8qK_WtAZaV_Zk/
1006546
1505803
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Stephane Bortzmeyer
2011-02-28
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/75sz5YUbj7NvZDr2hnHMOv1N3AE/
1006545
1505803
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Paul Vixie
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/PAPPzGoY5Nxd-1B34cVNL31hIhs/
1006544
1505801
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
John Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/DdTeCHjSd9NpOJdDCFB3sXeRl94/
1006543
1505801
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Patrik Fältström
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/b7YvthB2L6IcR1ZuPbsAlCZH09w/
1006542
1505803
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
John R. Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/fgUWjad5l9rAaFR6y38WG9xMWdA/
1006541
1505813
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Alex Bligh
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/HIswEJ0VYJzbVs51Mbeu5dXruQo/
1006540
1505813
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Paul Vixie
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/3G2C0QF0WrTVn5e_jcxVrGBMmfE/
1006539
1505801
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
John Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/4SVIB9dTBlVjKlXSr7GTrtFRCh4/
1006538
1505803
Re: [dnsext] RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Francis Dupont
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/B-MVCD4cPDFaLUHOPlfxNflxT6s/
1006537
1505801
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
John R. Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/AeqMV0HrqSMTYaW6RzR4UBHGf9E/
1006536
1505813
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
Alex Bligh
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/xNm76zK-3aX5KKKNZ_y0XRpx3IE/
1006535
1505813
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
John Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/_m3FJWQSln2py6haiVBuTgYFXXk/
1006534
1505813
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
John Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/P3qdjobJ6tGxcQqkoDcQtkzPdO4/
1006533
1505801
Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?Re: [dnsext] the same in old days, was making names the same NEED protocol changes?
John Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/-ZkD_iZQD4AwRKGJxy13EihV-q8/
1006532
1505813
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/k6dCSGf9oPRJ2aS328KzqPVgyT0/
1006531
1505813
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
John Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/jm2Re1OHXhYvZP59Vid4i3XW07A/
1006530
1505813
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Edward Lewis
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/glwlvxeBa0aOAWwVNPf_IhmU7LU/
1006529
1505801
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Edward Lewis
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/8WHlUkL8asJjTRc15jUCfDUqjSg/
1006528
1505801
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/Q4yeirwsd3bB7iTkvJb1Rjfsn_M/
1006527
1505813
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/uIz9tTVjWyMb65nvalT2S62o0As/
1006526
1505801
Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?Re: [dnsext] slave signing, was does making names the same NEED protocol changes at all?
John Levine
2011-02-27
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/AfyCdKdCSYxJFTqoXpbgfezCWbg/
1006525
1505813
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Mark Andrews
2011-02-26
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/C0HCIT9eqcnyEaRYCGik5COBpgY/
1006524
1505801
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
Edward Lewis
2011-02-26
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/5B0u4xjpTjioPG8Edft4c6mAP0M/
1006523
1505801
Re: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txtRe: [dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-aliasing-requirements-00.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-02-26
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/P9ZDqeR-keurt1cDnbLGounaEgY/
1006522
1505803
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035Re: [dnsext] Fwd: RFC 2308 & RFC 4035
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2011-02-26
namedroppers
/arch/msg/namedroppers/zMf-OxiGv63x_9lUCaj4pQIeGx8/
1006521
1505801