Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryptionRe: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption
Ian Swett
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/3bE_KoECI5LGUwWEHgCzWdRcqvA/
2569822
1777632
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Christian Huitema
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/4d4mtj9m942x6iibtiIgEr2PnvE/
2569698
1779909
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Ariel Otilibili Anieli
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/JhkBML22RdQYdk6F_rBdEeTDJ3w/
2569518
1779909
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Martin J. Dürst
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/6RSdZvkWeW1Jhe343g1ZZdbJIxw/
2569515
1779909
RE: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRE: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Ariel Otilibili Anieli
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/rm-qvrhXFUbEfEvp8-ZpTfvGrDY/
2569508
1779909
Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryptionRe: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption
Brian Trammell (IETF)
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/KwEOd_F8WxtV6k8LHIKYjsFopsM/
2569505
1777632
RE: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRE: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/uyLw_kNErNYHaRo1YhPkghIXI8k/
2569502
1779909
RE: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRE: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Lucas Pardue
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/riVqAnDGDx7ssWdc7ET_5jpa_M4/
2569501
1779909
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Martin Thomson
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/rQQXlURgSHYuGclWTHrzM5g0o3M/
2569469
1779909
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Ariel Otilibili Anieli
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/YMgOMiX1bmpgkREmC7opzEoHeDw/
2569468
1779909
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Martin J. Dürst
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/4rmE21vzJcnSnH4HqnyK1GrC4JU/
2569448
1779909
Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryptionRe: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption
Mark Nottingham
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/q8hq2VVO3ZvHDd_nEzcAcDzXexw/
2569426
1777632
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Martin Thomson
2018-04-09
quic
/arch/msg/quic/jNZ9Z0n3aQVEj0PquOYGEIacYu4/
2569408
1779909
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Ariel Otilibili Anieli
2018-04-08
quic
/arch/msg/quic/E1BWytF8OqL43PqJ4qcO0clHA-I/
2569343
1779909
Re: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingRe: Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2018-04-08
quic
/arch/msg/quic/eRheECD_E-LztF-7KItw7gVT4rs/
2569340
1779909
Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numberingReview of draft-ietf-quic-transport-10, and a proposal for a human-friendly QUIC version numbering
Ariel Otilibili Anieli
2018-04-08
quic
/arch/msg/quic/jCyjNxApAKjkKL7KvfyzcDRiaAE/
2569336
1779909
Weekly github digest (QUIC Working Group Specifications)Weekly github digest (QUIC Working Group Specifications)
Github Notifications
2018-04-08
quic
/arch/msg/quic/Ev6dEZRk_CQSvM_bOZBs7VRKbeA/
2569238
1779861
RE: Impact of hardware offloads on network stack performanceRE: Impact of hardware offloads on network stack performance
Praveen Balasubramanian
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/fqj8c1Uy6qmJ9Bg8Jsw7Wbqo41k/
2569057
1779355
Re: Impact of hardware offloads on network stack performanceRe: Impact of hardware offloads on network stack performance
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/aa34lb_puM5avklBcMtYlm0QiM0/
2569025
1779355
Re: Impact of hardware offloads on network stack performanceRe: Impact of hardware offloads on network stack performance
Ian Swett
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/I1RcDS_hr8IrfXJEbx8AXlypMZY/
2569020
1779355
RE: Impact of hardware offloads on network stack performanceRE: Impact of hardware offloads on network stack performance
Mike Bishop
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/2pFzHSqGlJjjhhNXrUcr6I1SChs/
2569017
1779355
RE: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))RE: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Praveen Balasubramanian
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/A9CiCFrBih7ZopTIege7DF5r3Kc/
2568920
1777632
RE: Server's Preferred AddressRE: Server's Preferred Address
Praveen Balasubramanian
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/9TcJJjxk_VbsSiwxE1QD6TfckHg/
2568913
1779539
RE: Getting to consensus on packet number encryptionRE: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption
Praveen Balasubramanian
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/Wkh7HsjutTXAO23t7HVfR6Rr3x8/
2568908
1777632
Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)
Kazuho Oku
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/J_mxKc751UlU6MgSMUsHptUcVOA/
2568902
1777632
Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Kazuho Oku
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/huQvBvQLKY7cAZ0wdZ_haBG87uE/
2568897
1777632
Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Spencer Dawkins at IETF
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/Y_ASJlVUXorKJvsE3TStZFjrXEw/
2568822
1777632
Re: Privacy holesRe: Privacy holes
Ian Swett
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/UaZMbFZhWQzL-W6noCthl9E7zHI/
2568790
1777632
Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Brian Trammell (IETF)
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/i7yB7FRh34oV6tCK9Q512qcoh0k/
2568788
1777632
Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Brian Trammell (IETF)
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/zlwWcxFdKxHC_BGUHhYag9-S40E/
2568787
1777632
Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Martin Thomson
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/BWLT9l1G3MPtuauIgfACg5y2q7g/
2568759
1777632
Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)
Martin Thomson
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/H3OABOwobh2sGTcNoDhTsyZHAUw/
2568757
1777632
Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Kazuho Oku
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/MHYZpvof1pjNA1FND8hC7m2L0_o/
2568752
1777632
Re: Privacy holesRe: Privacy holes
Roland Zink
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/6UA1f1-qk9uql10iQKXPAvJylhk/
2568751
1777632
Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))Re: Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/JCrWPnbHE-KFIqU7CziNswYkaFo/
2568744
1777632
Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))Grips in the Wire Image for In-Network State (was Re: Privacy holes (was Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption))
Brian Trammell (IETF)
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/i7s5IDGyG_797MgQcY-7P0Yb6E8/
2568743
1777632
Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)
Kazuho Oku
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/TYUjVsdm3-0hQGTkl_9cKIsRN7U/
2568736
1777632
Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)
Brian Trammell (IETF)
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/F9bgqBb-pIu6wmljzn9hs2lN5GY/
2568724
1777632
Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)
Martin Thomson
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/FNlPrZTV_FMgg3hRr65v_nrpeJ0/
2568712
1777632
Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)Re: Privacy holes (was: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption)
Brian Trammell (IETF)
2018-04-06
quic
/arch/msg/quic/wwLSgr-YstXRwZMZpP6XwhgZjdw/
2568703
1777632