Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU into its UA Contact marked?Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU into its UA Contact marked?
Mary Barnes
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/Qrl06Hs533YMjqDU6dOBsQq7BM0/
1357151
1616310
Re: [sipcore] #8: It's not clear when a Proxy should/should-not add H-I for "internal" stuffRe: [sipcore] #8: It's not clear when a Proxy should/should-not add H-I for "internal" stuff
Mary Barnes
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/BnKEOadviNoCh_EQaWGUoH0xWtA/
1357150
1616342
Re: [sipcore] #9: What should an SBC do when it resolves registered contacts?Re: [sipcore] #9: What should an SBC do when it resolves registered contacts?
Mary Barnes
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/CUHMNGkVSZqb-QI6Bx7vF3b9r0Y/
1357149
1616341
Re: [sipcore] New draft extending Reason headerRe: [sipcore] New draft extending Reason header
Mary Barnes
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/ETJFuaEZcReQA-8UowQ537WG3F4/
1357148
1616273
Re: [sipcore] #8: It's not clear when a Proxy should/should-not add H-I for "internal" stuffRe: [sipcore] #8: It's not clear when a Proxy should/should-not add H-I for "internal" stuff
Mary Barnes
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/jfE104Unfe4AuXs2tq_x4s-lMC0/
1357147
1616342
[sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-sec-flows[sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-sec-flows
Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/uNSpoy8mMELxZul2Ol1tGMMi2gw/
1357146
1616272
Re: [sipcore] #28: UACs should add H-I if they implement itRe: [sipcore] #28: UACs should add H-I if they implement it
Mary Barnes
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/W4CCGn7U1cuzobh0CYyh8YwHWd0/
1357145
1616320
Re: [sipcore] #10: Convert all SHOULDs to MUSTRe: [sipcore] #10: Convert all SHOULDs to MUST
Mary Barnes
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/xpSueHDfqIjT3ixBt_eHeVCUjNU/
1357144
1616340
Re: [sipcore] #4: The new "hit" parameter is gonna cause problemsRe: [sipcore] #4: The new "hit" parameter is gonna cause problems
Mary Barnes
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/bnWIZxv61X4UqzoJrvFVTRSjSSc/
1357143
1616347
[sipcore] New draft extending Reason header[sipcore] New draft extending Reason header
marianne.mohali
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/h7w1ingd_dUFViPdoKYd7h7T3xY/
1357142
1616273
[sipcore] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-07.txt[sipcore] I-D Action:draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-07.txt
Internet-Drafts
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/7OmUgQ0kQ1MDzpFVE0pEytpnoS0/
1357141
1616274
[sipcore] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-07 [was: Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05][sipcore] Draft new version: draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-07 [was: Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05]
Christer Holmberg
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/vW_FARHN1-vGrhhZaRmCoJlFF58/
1357140
1616352
Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05
Christer Holmberg
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/I1OJN75nS82G6_I9FQAkJjrAvOY/
1357139
1616352
Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05
Adam Roach
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/vyqSy4U5XwcUyXGK68P6XrWDmoQ/
1357138
1616352
Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05
Christer Holmberg
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/ONNxfNYOpNdX6vSmt0KdfYRssy0/
1357137
1616352
Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05
Adam Roach
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/vznVM-TJP8szcrXfeJp55K6aVaY/
1357136
1616352
Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05Re: [sipcore] Comments on draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-05
Christer Holmberg
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/hIkck5yuSp9uMRQa7IzrDvYBA-0/
1357135
1616352
Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?
Christer Holmberg
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/1H-0WXxCOr42-Hx7EDZvJ1pXPVA/
1357134
1616279
Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?
Paul Kyzivat
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/DwTO3edQkrvimvhTynqWlkmaIc8/
1357133
1616279
Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-holmberg-sipcore-proxy-feature [was: Feature-tags in the Path header field]Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-holmberg-sipcore-proxy-feature [was: Feature-tags in the Path header field]
gao.yang2
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/4-pjD11bhZ2KV_K4Pn9Y_CGGaTw/
1357132
1616298
Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-holmberg-sipcore-proxy-feature [was: Feature-tags in the Path header field]Re: [sipcore] Draft new: draft-holmberg-sipcore-proxy-feature [was: Feature-tags in the Path header field]
DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/2xONb6fbogorhtMd4DA3nWA1y9Q/
1357131
1616298
Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?
gao.yang2
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/AYf9VcvaYHPYBxdz0lLOVhWA48Y/
1357130
1616279
Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?
gao.yang2
2010-10-13
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/jlWnAI8PemWgueuldn_LbjNyuz4/
1357129
1616279
Re: [sipcore] #34: Semantics of History-Info values need to be documented explicitlyRe: [sipcore] #34: Semantics of History-Info values need to be documented explicitly
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/-l2EewOGYojybwZ5TRiyuJnEEkc/
1357128
1616314
Re: [sipcore] #40: Clarify mp-valueRe: [sipcore] #40: Clarify mp-value
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/eRmK0uzE9mKmC1g-3s1kRMS5B00/
1357127
1616308
Re: [sipcore] #35: "target parameter" is used but seems to have no meaningRe: [sipcore] #35: "target parameter" is used but seems to have no meaning
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/7swJEN14jVjkTpmtsO5HKZMN3io/
1357126
1616313
Re: [sipcore] #42: Backwards compatibilityRe: [sipcore] #42: Backwards compatibility
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/HJvr2wNgEWJ8CM_y2Dyusx3INyc/
1357125
1616306
Re: [sipcore] #25: Proxy adding H-I must create element 1.Re: [sipcore] #25: Proxy adding H-I must create element 1.
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/FaMiv6FWAqMcLUS-zmBE0WkfBi8/
1357124
1616323
Re: [sipcore] #23: Which elements a particular normative passage applies toRe: [sipcore] #23: Which elements a particular normative passage applies to
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/soBo5iBC8R6eZHz_nwygEOO8Bjk/
1357123
1616325
Re: [sipcore] #24: Redirect serversRe: [sipcore] #24: Redirect servers
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/GYTOhBIi08NA9UfvfD3pPPJRmr0/
1357122
1616324
Re: [sipcore] #14: Section 7 item 4 is useless or misleadingRe: [sipcore] #14: Section 7 item 4 is useless or misleading
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/9B61Tu08JWKPdt3v4lbCvOEqzmc/
1357121
1616336
Re: [sipcore] #13: Section 7 item 2 is not completeRe: [sipcore] #13: Section 7 item 2 is not complete
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/YugWPZh6U6wppNir7vzxWGRT9Qc/
1357120
1616337
Re: [sipcore] #41: Why does only "mp" have a value?Re: [sipcore] #41: Why does only "mp" have a value?
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/fieIjoag2e_536xXmOr_LgZYCec/
1357119
1616307
Re: [sipcore] #15: Section 7 item 5 is wrongRe: [sipcore] #15: Section 7 item 5 is wrong
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/Kii5y0JhFBMGTiHROb7mwXG9duY/
1357118
1616335
Re: [sipcore] #19/#20: Show Cancel messaging/Handling canceled forksRe: [sipcore] #19/#20: Show Cancel messaging/Handling canceled forks
Mary Barnes
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/IxiDeCXMjj_R2GjgYjFXjRqRkvI/
1357117
1616275
Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?
Worley, Dale R (Dale)
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/S7r6vkGK4sg--0Jy01uU_37J_oc/
1357116
1616279
Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?
Paul Kyzivat
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/Ahnm0qdkNF8Icvz4zNrZA_1zDHM/
1357115
1616279
[sipcore] Protocol Action: 'Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) INFO Method and Package Framework' to Proposed Standard[sipcore] Protocol Action: 'Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) INFO Method and Package Framework' to Proposed Standard
The IESG
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/nIy26hVxWriyFsJXzzi_fwLtS_I/
1357114
1616276
Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?
Christer Holmberg
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/5pTo5b9p5LUhnqkusgPn9Hpuq84/
1357113
1616279
Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?Re: [sipcore] About RFC3911(Join header)'s potential error: //Join header in REFER?
Christer Holmberg
2010-10-12
sipcore
/arch/msg/sipcore/bYcw5aipeL-PGJDMymlJscUtf_A/
1357112
1616279