Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/IFsZ6l4Ygn9FeNA8NRzIcfwBg0w/
2395445
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Eran Messeri
2017-05-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/na1eTNo9r37soicBpjLgjuUzoD8/
2395436
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/IdTxWj0W-QXCjEdvFOWCEjgGwaQ/
2395131
1702279
Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpointsRe: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints
Richard Barnes
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ejNjvCoPVL4UFC3MiXVpFHr1iHs/
2395101
1702193
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Gary Belvin
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/JOyKZJpoH5IIEhQUNHp-Gb0QqNw/
2395059
1702279
Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpointsRe: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/sl_I27hgvStPAf1VZSdknCXVMlw/
2395017
1702193
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/XouOOh2qNCcY4EgFvCCzuzjn1Aw/
2395013
1702279
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/JbFiwO90PjcYzXrEgh-Y7bFG5Fw/
2394997
1702158
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #190: Simplify data structures in 6962-bisRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #190: Simplify data structures in 6962-bis
trans issue tracker
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Qo4mFkKSegQHi9auTQQGPtdE3ec/
2394971
1703334
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Eran Messeri
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/tittXZRosWonh0dUxPlubKxswfw/
2394963
1702279
Re: [Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)Re: [Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/d-bekEhpkIHy3X_TLX-wOq23a3M/
2394931
1704004
Re: [Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSSRe: [Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS
Eran Messeri
2017-05-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Roj2-n64Ohau1rPj0yippZ7CDzo/
2394928
1703662
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Brian Smith
2017-05-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/yEqQjM8ut0FobsNz9Wz1wkXhl-c/
2394665
1702158
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Matt Palmer
2017-05-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/M9oN4iJRBKTGNd9mLd_KNCb9iW0/
2394526
1702158
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Nick Sullivan
2017-05-19
trans
/arch/msg/trans/KRpMYPHXLl4eoUWKAfGvyTeheWI/
2394463
1702158
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Brian Smith
2017-05-19
trans
/arch/msg/trans/3_HgMV-WeFuYqD9oYswo2wc2F1Q/
2394457
1702158
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Al Cutter
2017-05-19
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Zfha4ziI_5CaUNx-gWnfKOwtFE8/
2394388
1702158
Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpointsRe: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints
Rob Stradling
2017-05-19
trans
/arch/msg/trans/7wnLzyEWKySupaV-3kmy7c64e18/
2394350
1702193
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-19
trans
/arch/msg/trans/YXbOFJIyzeNnfd4nCypzt9BqBqk/
2394303
1702158
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-17
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vR4c7hmPyesTQWn7hmcFz_FRoP4/
2393242
1702158
Re: [Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)Re: [Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)
Salz, Rich
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/1Q5bQTG9CaBTWBk1SW5YuB5Uf8Y/
2392515
1704004
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #162: Bound the set of artifacts a log is expected to produceRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #162: Bound the set of artifacts a log is expected to produce
trans issue tracker
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/iNk17r_VIIV_Fzu0xQ25H9HgvlM/
2392505
1700499
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/q3aTjtEFJvFZS2Yw5q0rY4rf95Y/
2392501
1702158
[Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)[Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6MdLvefG23g4gcucUZ4Qox5ZhtA/
2392486
1704004
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Eran Messeri
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6CDtLNEDe6VSdL5L1-TqENccg1c/
2392382
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/VNtD4Y528TDgagbT__KMdKpb5X0/
2392371
1702279
Re: [Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSSRe: [Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS
Richard Barnes
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/eGK_3SWJelxjLOwx_6s1JfRzzqI/
2391871
1703662
[Trans] Reminder: we'd like to get into wg last call[Trans] Reminder: we'd like to get into wg last call
Melinda Shore
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/otzvdWhYSikV_2nLKnPbcdzmfEw/
2391865
1703665
[Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS[Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS
Brian Smith
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_4RPyHCVTYuPmWebsLn0ov68A1k/
2391859
1703662
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Brian Smith
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_gbke6gkhjEQiyT6u8xi6bhgDlY/
2391857
1702279
Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpointsRe: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/S75unzbzZ3RWpJQwb0q9Rp7Co6o/
2391756
1702193
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Eran Messeri
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/9tP5-dHjp0UwcvxVeGDdkC9RJhU/
2391743
1702279
Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpointsRe: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints
Eran Messeri
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/SOx42hQATpsK3TOqV9ZvABUiWwo/
2391739
1702193
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #178: Add description of how to validate an SCTRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #178: Add description of how to validate an SCT
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/JHO5LDImGxnWpvjIhHJ9P-VWwmI/
2391703
1703573
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #176: Remove `X509ChainEntry` and `PrecertChainEntryV2`Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #176: Remove `X509ChainEntry` and `PrecertChainEntryV2`
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/wiHVtRMPpGfZONFzoe8ES4uXYsc/
2391691
1703566
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #164: Incorporate new protocol mechanisms into TLS Client sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #164: Incorporate new protocol mechanisms into TLS Client section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/VOfQHfyjvKPCU03FS2Lcyfj9KCM/
2391687
1703564
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #175: Clarify guarantees around MMD, STH ageRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #175: Clarify guarantees around MMD, STH age
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vN95laFwpASVSjFMG_wBf2_03Kw/
2391652
1703549
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCTRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Y7tjIEDkXtK_9XF4vNY_BwACS04/
2391408
1701999
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rxwA5fra8Qagooly5U2GAwbXAxo/
2391406
1702689
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/BGhGKHxRwRx7mJbtAH9aOxajKxE/
2391403
1702731