Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-19
trans
/arch/msg/trans/YXbOFJIyzeNnfd4nCypzt9BqBqk/
2394303
1702158
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-17
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vR4c7hmPyesTQWn7hmcFz_FRoP4/
2393242
1702158
Re: [Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)Re: [Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)
Salz, Rich
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/1Q5bQTG9CaBTWBk1SW5YuB5Uf8Y/
2392515
1704004
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #162: Bound the set of artifacts a log is expected to produceRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #162: Bound the set of artifacts a log is expected to produce
trans issue tracker
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/iNk17r_VIIV_Fzu0xQ25H9HgvlM/
2392505
1700499
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/q3aTjtEFJvFZS2Yw5q0rY4rf95Y/
2392501
1702158
[Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)[Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6MdLvefG23g4gcucUZ4Qox5ZhtA/
2392486
1704004
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Eran Messeri
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6CDtLNEDe6VSdL5L1-TqENccg1c/
2392382
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-15
trans
/arch/msg/trans/VNtD4Y528TDgagbT__KMdKpb5X0/
2392371
1702279
Re: [Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSSRe: [Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS
Richard Barnes
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/eGK_3SWJelxjLOwx_6s1JfRzzqI/
2391871
1703662
[Trans] Reminder: we'd like to get into wg last call[Trans] Reminder: we'd like to get into wg last call
Melinda Shore
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/otzvdWhYSikV_2nLKnPbcdzmfEw/
2391865
1703665
[Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS[Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS
Brian Smith
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_4RPyHCVTYuPmWebsLn0ov68A1k/
2391859
1703662
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Brian Smith
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_gbke6gkhjEQiyT6u8xi6bhgDlY/
2391857
1702279
Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpointsRe: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/S75unzbzZ3RWpJQwb0q9Rp7Co6o/
2391756
1702193
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Eran Messeri
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/9tP5-dHjp0UwcvxVeGDdkC9RJhU/
2391743
1702279
Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpointsRe: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints
Eran Messeri
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/SOx42hQATpsK3TOqV9ZvABUiWwo/
2391739
1702193
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #178: Add description of how to validate an SCTRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #178: Add description of how to validate an SCT
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/JHO5LDImGxnWpvjIhHJ9P-VWwmI/
2391703
1703573
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #176: Remove `X509ChainEntry` and `PrecertChainEntryV2`Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #176: Remove `X509ChainEntry` and `PrecertChainEntryV2`
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/wiHVtRMPpGfZONFzoe8ES4uXYsc/
2391691
1703566
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #164: Incorporate new protocol mechanisms into TLS Client sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #164: Incorporate new protocol mechanisms into TLS Client section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/VOfQHfyjvKPCU03FS2Lcyfj9KCM/
2391687
1703564
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #175: Clarify guarantees around MMD, STH ageRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #175: Clarify guarantees around MMD, STH age
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vN95laFwpASVSjFMG_wBf2_03Kw/
2391652
1703549
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCTRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Y7tjIEDkXtK_9XF4vNY_BwACS04/
2391408
1701999
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rxwA5fra8Qagooly5U2GAwbXAxo/
2391406
1702689
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/BGhGKHxRwRx7mJbtAH9aOxajKxE/
2391403
1702731
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/KOZruiywS1Z3E0dHxb0XDqObosk/
2391402
1702647
[Trans] Seeking feedback: Simplification of get-entries in 6962-bis and associated data structures[Trans] Seeking feedback: Simplification of get-entries in 6962-bis and associated data structures
Eran Messeri
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/FRpgoEV2vM-c3XWrFQ4L0btkBLo/
2391209
1703337
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCTRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/zdtrmOroLOO1qHkBB-uPw2JqryM/
2391201
1701999
[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #190: Simplify data structures in 6962-bis[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #190: Simplify data structures in 6962-bis
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/zqd8vtOJy9YzT-B9niMq8Rnn_U8/
2391200
1703334
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/baq903vVTqbdZFkY_jIi66Qqkzw/
2390276
1702689
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/GX4yfzWsjiihutUYObRQhlSzbYA/
2390226
1702647
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/slDhAuH3WW1AvX9wManfViWe4fg/
2390224
1702731
[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #189: Permit logs to use EdDSA[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #189: Permit logs to use EdDSA
trans issue tracker
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/DUy_4QfFko3iHaKbvqDhM8O9G88/
2390192
1702935
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Eran Messeri
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Z761Yh3JwWfVMQYXFs1ZUIhuYPw/
2390187
1702731
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qUzImASh1AqAUWSbdnXqhmR0rMU/
2389864
1702731
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/p6HbhiPS_8zW7KKLqLowxwjGDEc/
2389844
1702731
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vuJTJ5o5ufMQxbjSaHiVcyIgHz0/
2389843
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Al Cutter
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/DQYeipmMvZdBezoXEvroN2dwrn4/
2389837
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Tom Ritter
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rkqB8dwxILTBJ79iOvcowjgNpgk/
2389804
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/851tkezX8c78XX8q6qgksFlpw7g/
2389800
1702279
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_pES1bhCxHuOihiyawNOO0fZi6w/
2389774
1702160
[Trans] Ticket 170[Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rqmakAfYB9HnkffCDWi9r09Ic98/
2389773
1702731
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/U9QEfCa_op-t_3Ln_K5CK-lOz0A/
2389675
1702689