Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Bouk_M5dp66Pb-g1PQvr1iV5rwI/
2696746
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Owen DeLong
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/S3FpD0b3a4goe56KvGzTCO0FwkY/
2696741
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/eQTZ401DxPEMLz0F7Ldf-898m-s/
2696731
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
David Farmer
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/PStG15sE_9G06j4TEsuvQL6QsYc/
2696727
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Michael Richardson
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/NqsZ42KGBbmQCjt8RycCmXmjvVM/
2696724
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/TmiEjzYP9xy-LZFQK8g2aTsRaF8/
2696679
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/vdg9lVXHiqxkA-msUn_boDyUotY/
2696673
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/uPV_8io578PYQ6kX54Gklso5hO4/
2696667
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/oyIXi4IcPSg7XfkhQtkykurSeYQ/
2696658
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
David Farmer
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/4Teh_2fhw7x0tbUsjNProdZlq6s/
2696650
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Timothy Winters
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/etpEvj-Zk0XS2Rp61-xI5mn1bXc/
2696646
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Tim Chown
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/iKh4WCvDQtSv2du2OAVL5ltv2Qc/
2696642
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/skQ3TLbQ3U1WzKgyIUKujZmmnIU/
2696629
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Michael Richardson
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/tq457w5P1bkjYqNJqv39LeemCj0/
2696623
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Owen DeLong
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/_otaKlTKnEiAewNrP_V6UNZD-tc/
2696622
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Christian Huitema
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/q4c52Vqkumb96Y6pvGr_ItODWXI/
2696611
1825008
[v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)[v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/LsQhggz4vPO-cvwkNs0gYcbMqCU/
2696599
1825008
Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT -- Re: NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT -- Re: NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yiEE3a41RuSUVsP79Lw8tZxuRlo/
2696527
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Nick Hilliard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Zjut9Y__6I7oWRj47OEGMpf2gTU/
2696498
1825008
[v6ops] 464XLAT -- Re: NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)[v6ops] 464XLAT -- Re: NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Lencse Gábor
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/KjWllF3VvILlXJlusD6z5kffWT0/
2696467
1825008
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Mark Smith
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/HaxEbkxNdTknzH9FjvgCe9wf-H8/
2696416
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Christian Huitema
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Slnx4DApLlqc6uzeR2Wilg_FL6E/
2696414
1825008
[v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)[v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Mark Smith
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/pdwJjZCBB7feVO1jnENhXViYBtc/
2696410
1825008
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Kristian McColm
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mGeXg5ghX0XhskKVKqbv2NA0eeM/
2696383
1825008
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Raymond Burkholder
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Qg1f0Du1yDnv6kL1V-6ifTz4fSc/
2696372
1825008
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/IdQXjgNaWanzw7fYcULaPy_VSTc/
2696346
1825008
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Kristian McColm
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/YtgRXjFjLjpz0HjgxHvk7W6jLfU/
2696338
1825008
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/XqtE6fBcikYlHlMMfPkwEOUTQgg/
2696325
1825008
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Kristian McColm
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xB_hkjyBeabGT4pIIaJ73BfzGGA/
2696314
1825008
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/6DbumuG2zejYbLZEiiKKiSJjV8o/
2696311
1825008
[v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)[v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Fernando Gont
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xR_-HKcPUH20j4vy09RABTm6h_k/
2696302
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Ie0TCHsgp-xjtqjQJRFxVOXdiGg/
2696300
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/NyLxDRyXuDwMiUHMtbDHdDzaxRo/
2696297
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yjhSJ7kYQbXM1o9qpuoshYF_N0c/
2696295
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/1-bljvU9CdhcRQ3-eTcuT5hFUGc/
2696294
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/9tt8NP5ZdrpxB0db-NJ1xuC_BTo/
2696280
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Owen DeLong
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/H3a4rrPoFjtvr9fRBOOFRE7-Dfk/
2696276
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/a_K8eb09NmDFROZSJ5hP_iN-1ms/
2696270
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Lorenzo Colitti
2019-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Fp_A8annRdm1lWeZJtExY5h3nCI/
2696257
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Lorenzo Colitti
2019-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/aerd5rFfLjKONAI3Q7A-ieJ3BXk/
2696256
1825008