Re: [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?

Matthew Finkel <> Sat, 31 July 2021 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83623A1292 for <>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 11:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zr0MBMfTjJx3 for <>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 11:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14C23A1290 for <>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 11:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GcXHX42pxzDs9P; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 11:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Riseup-User-ID: E26A1B76008E8730CB062CD0399A4C35491A764674C72402CF03E08C1A5F79AA
Received: from [] (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GcXHS5P9bz5vbC; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 11:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:05:17 +0000
From: Matthew Finkel <>
To: Carsten Bormann <>,
Message-ID: <20210731180517.g2l43erk422w74qo@localhost>
References: <> <20210730214914.y4zrqylmn7ynf2cj@localhost> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:05:35 -0000

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 01:16:30AM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 30. Jul 2021, at 23:49, Matthew Finkel <> wrote:
> > 
> > I'm still new around here, so please excuse my ignorance. Are you
> > concerned about malicious edits? Have you seen abuse? Is there an
> > inherent need for edit attribution?
> Much less nefarious — I was taking notes with two other people, and I couldn’t see who they were — a little nudge to authenticate in the browser that you use for note-taking would take this uncertainty away.
> (Why is that important?  If you do shared note taking, you want to know who is distracted, who knows about a particular subject so you can let them write that up, etc.  It’s just harder to fly blind.)

Thanks for explaining the motivation, this is very helpful. I see
authorship of anonymous edits [0][1] should be available in a newer
version, but, from what I can see, a "Guest" can't set their own name .
That is an unfortunate limitation [2].

Requiring being logged-in is an immediate solution, but hopefully [2]
will provide an alternative in the future.


> The possibility of malicious edits hasn’t hit us yet, and it might, so that may be another reason to go for “logged in” authorization.
> But those really determined to grief would find a way anyway...

Yes, that is certainly a risk, but I encourage supporting
anonymous/pseudonymous contributions and edits because they are
valuable, until this is no longer sustainable.


> Grüße, Carsten
> -- 
> 111attendees mailing list